Page 3 - The 'X' Chronicles Newspaper - August/September 2017

A Look At The Billy Meier “Prophecies” 3

A Look at the Billy Meier

“Prophecies.”

by Dr. Kevin Randle

One of the pillars propping up the Billy Meier
contact case is the allegedly uncanny
predictions that he had made over the years.
These have been published widely and it is
possible to bring some of that under scrutiny
now that enough time has passed.
According to Michael Horn, Meier’s
American spokesman, quoting from some of the
Meier predictions and writing in Ronald Story’s
The Encyclopedia of Extraterrestrial
Encounters, Meier had said that TWA Flight 800
was brought down by an “errant U.S. Navy
missile.”
For those unfamiliar with this aircraft
accident, TWA Flight 800 took off from JFK in Meier, as well as those who thought the face on multiple entries provided by Meier and his
New York and crashed some twelve minutes Mars was an artificial construct, have been supporters about what he had said and when he
later. Given that there were concerns that the proven wrong. had said it. Horn wrote about the 7th Contact, 25
aircraft had been brought down in a terrorist Meier, through Horn, also mentioned February 1975; 35th Contact, 16 September
attack, there was a parallel investigation by the that part of the problem with the hole in the 1975, that “Connection of A-bomb testing,
National Transportation Safety Board and the ozone, which has plagued the planet since the explosions to ozone damage, high frequency
FBI. After four years, the NTSB concluded that 1970s, was brought about by atmospheric ‘elementary radiations’ unknown to terrestrial
the crash was caused by an explosion in the nuclear testing. According to Meier, and his scientists, damage to Earth’s rotation, magnetic
center fuel tank. No evidence was found that a Pleiadian pal Semjase, “…the greatest and at the disturbances, polar displacement; contribution
missile, or any other explosive was responsible time unknown to us, damage was caused by of bromine gases to ozone damage, penetration
for the accident. Although there were eye atomic testing of the late 1940s, 1950s, and of UV through holes killing microorganisms,
witnesses who said they had seen a missile, it 1960s (which released certain ‘elementary leading to disruptions in food chain, genetic
should be noted here that various radars did radiations that our scientists didn’t have a means mutations, other long term negative effects for
track the flight and while there were multiple of detecting) as well as from bromine and CFC humans and the planet.”
targets around the aircraft, none of them gases… Semjase told Meier that the explosions The problem here is that there were
intersected with it. In other words, TWA 800 of the atomic devices tore holes in the ozone…” already a number of published reports about the
was not brought down by “an errant U.S. Navy Current science does not agree with this. ozone and atomic testing. According to research
missile,” or any other external force. Meier’s Various organizations including NOAA, the published by ike42 in April 2004, The New York
prophesy turned out to be in error. U.N., NASA, the EPA, and the World Times on September 6, 1974, reported, “The
Yes, it will be claimed that the solution Meteorological Organization have all blamed potential depletion of the ozone layer by nuclear
is government disinformation and that Meier is bromine and CFCs for the hole in the ozone. explosions is a new, accidental discovery…”
correct. However, in my independent research, I Some of this exists in the atmosphere naturally On October 17, 1974, The New York
found nothing to suggest that the government such as bromine and chorine which is part of the Times reported, “The Defense Department
was in error. Their answer seems to be the CFC. While we can argue about human estimates that an all-out nuclear war would
correct one and the Meier camp has provided no contribution to the destruction of the Ozone significantly deplete the protective layer of
contradictory proof. Layer, or rather the hole in it, atomic testing did ozone in the stratosphere…”
Horn has said that “What we call the not cause it. In fact, natural weather and winds Science on October 25, 1974, reported
‘Face on Mars’ is, according to Meier, only the have a role in the depletion of the ozone, that “Supersonic transports, aerosol sprays and
tip of the artifact-iceberg of what exists, and something that Meier did not mention. nuclear weapons… are all potential sources of
will be one day found by man, on the now But here’s the thing about this. If you read the catalytic agents that penetrate the earth’s
desolate planet. Meier contends that Mars was latest interpretation of this warning, published stratosphere and decompose the ozone…”
one of three planets in the solar system that have by Kåre Bergheim in January 2014, there is a Contrary to what has been published by
been inhabited by humans. The other planet single mention that doesn’t exactly address the Meier and his followers, there is a clear body of
(besides Mars and Earth) was called ‘Malona’ atomic testing. According to Bergheim, quoting evidence that terrestrial scientists were
or ‘Maldek’ (its remnants now making up the from the Plejadisch-plejarische Kontaktberichte concerned about the ozone prior to the
asteroid belt).” (contact reports), conversations, block 1 (2002) predictions made in 1975. Interestingly, just
Overlooking the fact that the idea of the s.74 Contact 7 Tuesday, 25th February, 1975, days after the 7th Contact, The New York Times
asteroid belt being made from a broken-up time 18.02, “Primarily are also destroying reported on February 28, 1957, about Dr.
planet was big in science fiction in the1950s and chemical substances, gases and radiations, being Michael B. McElroy of Harvard University…”
1960s, we know that it is the result of a planet released by combustion engines and other Ike42 in his analysis remarked, “I find it
that never formed. Current scientific thought matter-destroying processes of other types, like suspicious that the newspaper article and
suggests that Jupiter’s gravitational influence is for example nuclear fission and other similar Meier’s Contact Notes both mention Dr.
responsible for that. This means, of course, that forms, which since 1945, to a large extent have Michael McElroy…” And, since we only have
Meier is wrong about a planet having been there subjected the whole world and all life forms to Meier’s handwritten notation for the date, it
or that there had been humans on it. an evil change.” While there is a mention of becomes even more suspicious.
As for the Face on Mars, we know that nuclear fission, there is nothing about atomic
it is a natural formation caused by the resolution bombs directly, or above ground testing of those (Continued on Page 4)
of the camera taking the photographs and tricks weapons in the years that followed. Here, it A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE
of lighting on terrain features on the planet’s seems that the important point is the CFCs. In
surface. Subsequent photographs of the same Meier’s letter about this, written not long after with DR. KEVIN RANDLE
area, using a higher resolution camera, at a the waring, he does not mention the atomic Daily on
different angle, at a different time of day testing at all. The ‘X’ Zone Broadcast Network
showed the face as the natural formation it is. There is more to all this however, and it
becomes somewhat confusing because of the WWW.XZBN.NET