Page 9 - 20090506 - The 'X' Chronicles Newspaper - May / June 2009

9 Billy Meier: Contactee or Prophet? 9 Billy Meier: Contactee or Prophet? Look Out for That a photographic, film and special effects expert NAVIGATING Look Out for That NAVIGATING with 50 years in the industry. While that may Tree! honestly be debatable, as he and other image, Tree! THE photography and special effects people have THE Continued from Page 8 said (many of whom are UFO skeptics), "If the Continued from Page 8 HEALTHCARE accusers are so sure it's a deliberate hoax...then HEALTHCARE The Light/Energy Ship UFO they should duplicate it." Instead, of course, MAZE these skeptics have simply refused to even MAZE attempt to duplicate this (or any other) photo (or film) of Meier's. It's also funny that these same skeptics (who can't come up with one attempted duplication between them) complain that without Meier's original negatives they can't determine if a picture is genuine…but for some reason they can say that it's a fake! But perhaps the most telling evidence that Biedney had falsely claimed that he had “proved” the photo a hoax was when another expert in PhotoShop (Biedney's specialty) challenged his findings on the forum. Surprisingly, Biedney sheepishly back-peddled and said that he'd have to “see the original film The first photo has been attacked as a negative/positive for this image to follow up in "deliberate hoax" by two skeptics, David a reasonable fashion.” When I pointed this out, Biedney and Gene Steinberg: Biedney's response was that the guy was a "Michael, seriously, these photos are so "Meierite" (whatever that's supposed to be). completely faked, it's sad to read your words Well, what better opportunity to discredit the trying to establish that they're real..." guy, if that was the case, which it apparently "A photo enlarger circa that era would wasn't? have served nicely to produce the picture in (These same skeptics accuse Meier of There has never been a more question from two negatives placed one atop the having "unseen helpers", which not only was important time to maintain your health — other…" proven to be absolutely untrue** during the during these challenging economic times. If "The photos are fairly amateurish. I eight-year investigation, but also indicates that you get sick the challenge today of think movie professionals would have done a they think the Meier evidence is so impressive navigating the healthcare maze is much better job faking those pictures. They that he just must have had help, since they know potentially dangerous and ridiculously would work more carefully to eliminate the that all of them together couldn't produce a expensive — considering deductibles and blatant flaws that so many have discovered." fraction of the physical evidence that Meier co-pay and especially without health "While I realize most people, while has.) insurance. perfectly intelligent, aren't skilled in photo Strangely, the skeptics also didn't claim Our personal health and healthcare trickery, I'm surprised there isn't more that they could "prove" that this following must be regarded as the most important skepticism here. Holding models on a string and picture of the same object is a hoax - or any of priority of today’s challenges.We generally photographing them against a background of the other Meier photos (including all those on seem to think we are not going to get a trees or buildings is old school." this page) - they just thought making the major health problem..well that is when "Taking ALL the "evidence" into (incorrect) accusation about one photo was such a problem arises. account makes it so clear to easily and quickly enough to end the discussion, which it was, as When we do get sick, we are not make the case that the Meier story is a far as taking them seriously. prepared, generally passive, don’t reserch contrived, planned case of disinformation and enough, take the first diagnoses we’re outright lies…." given, fail to ask informed questions, and "Mr. Meier is positioned as a prophet, have not done the health maintenance our seer and wise being, and while he is cunning, bodies deserve. We cannot live without our the weakness of the photos, videos, sound (a health!. Today the healthcare system is blatant use of vintage analog synthesizers, any truly a complex maze.And when you have true audio expert recognizes analog oscillators, such complexities, human errors will occur. filters and delays, it just so happens that I'm an This book is a wakeup call meant to _experienced_ synth guy) is damning…" encourage a more responsible, proactive, and approach to consumer-oriented "In short, Meier is lying, and you're a personal and family health — before it is guilty accomplice." too late. Are you going to sit on the It should be mentioned that the online sidelines and observe yourself being forum maintained by Beidney and Steinberg pushed through the maze? Or will you step survived almost entirely by attacking the Meier up to the plate, take a couple of swings, and case and me. And they were among the loudest Photo 40 © FIGU go for the fence? voices attacking the credibility, and scientific Order From record, of Marcel Vogel. Vogel did an extensive Continued on Page 11 Order From (videotaped) analysis of metal alloy samples www. allegedly given Meier by the Plejaren, using an electron-scanning microscope. The negative navigatingthehealthcaremaze attacks on Vogel, by Beidney and Steinberg, .com etc., are easily refuted here: http://www.theyfly.com/newsflash4/m_vogel.ht Amazon.com m. Now, the first photo that these learned (also available on Kindle) skeptics claimed was an "out of camera", double and other fine exposure, is most likely a triple exposure, done BookStores. accidentally in camera by Meier - according to www.douglasjamescottrell.com