Page 59 - Education in a Digital World
P. 59

46  International Organisations


            prime driving force and as a model for its imitators or partners elsewhere” (Levidow
            2002, p.234). From this latter perspective, although the educational motivations and
            interests of SNOs and IGOs are varied and extensive, many could be said to follow
            a neo-liberal, human capital perspective in terms of how “the world’s wealthy
            nations need to educate their populations for competition in the global knowledge
            economy” (Spring 2009, p.58).
              Yet from whatever perspective they are approached, it is important to understand
            the educational activities and agendas of these SNOs and IGOs in a nuanced and
            heterogeneous manner that acknowledges the differences between them. While a
            dominant strand of the World Bank educational agenda has certainly been the
            pursuit of ‘reform agendas’ of privatisation, deregulation and commercialisation of
            education (Levidow 2002, Bergeron 2008), the OECD could be said to have pur-
            sued a slightly less interventionist approach towards education, noticeably con-
            centrating on the measurement and commensurability of educational systems in
            terms of their efficiency and high-skills nature. Moreover, the educational interests
            of an organisation focused on humanitarianism and security-related concerns such as
            the United Nations, for instance, may also privilege issues such as “educating global
            citizens committed to sustainable development; sustain and protect cultures and
            languages; gender equality; activist citizen[s]” (Spring 2009, p.81). The actions of
            all these organisations are therefore imbued with varying perspectives on what
            education is, and what education is for.
              A key question to consider in the terms of our own discussion, then, is the
            extent to which these interests and agendas are replicated in the educational
            technology activities of the world’s major IGOs and SNOs. In this sense, it is first
            important to recognise that the use of digital technology has long been a
            significant element of the educational activities of these organisations. Indeed,
            intergovernmental organisations such as the World Bank, OECD and United
            Nations have all been prominent advocates of educational technology since the
            1980s and have played a substantial collective role in initiating and influencing
            the implementation of educational technology around the world. As Joel Spring
            (2009, p.48) describes in relation to the activities of the World Bank throughout
            the 2000s:

                 Given the goal of preparation for the knowledge economy, the World
                 Bank emphasises the classroom use of computers and resources from the
                 internet. ICT allows the adaptation of globally available information to local
                 learning situations … It is important to highlight that a large percentage of
                 the World Bank’s education funds are used for the purchase of educational
                 technology. Critics might complain that this channels large sums of money to
                 be used for education to multinational producers of computers and educa-
                 tional software. On the other hand ICT is vital for education to enter the
                 knowledge economy … It is estimated that between 1997 and 2001 that [sic]
                 75 per cent of the World Bank-financed education projects included ICT,
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64