Page 129 - Albanian law on entrepreuners and companies - text with with commentary
P. 129

PART V
                                  JOINT-STOCK COMPANIES

            Comments:

            1.   While LLCs are typically designed for small and medium sized enterprises which are
            financed  by  a  closed  group  of  shareholders,  joint  stock  companies  (JSCs)  are  typically
            designed  for  large  enterprises  which  satisfy  their  financial  needs  by  offering  shares  to  the
            public. Whereas LLCs applies a flexible regime of internal relations and external safeguards,
            JSCs  are  subjected  to  rather  rigid  rules  of  governance  and  the  protection of  investors  and
            creditors due their size and importance for the economic system. JSCs are still subjected to
            the  rigid  system  of  the  Second  Company  Law  Directive  on  capital  contributions  and
            maintenance.  However,  we  mentioned  in  above  Comments  to  Article  70  that  the  recent
            regulatory trend in EU Company Law is to liberlize the requirements of the Second Directive.
            One of the first results of these reform activities are the amendments introduced by Directive
            2006/68/EC  which  allow  for  more  flexibility  as  regards  the  valuation  of  considerations  in
            kind, the acquistion of company’s own shares and financial support for this acquisition. As
            enhanced flexibility and ‘slim’ 127  regulations have started to dominate both the LLC and the
            JSC area, the mentioned focus on directors’ liability can be found in both regulatory contexts.
            This is an example of the fact that ‘deregulation’ can never proceed and be successul without
            a corresponding ‘re-regulation’ which replaces rigid organizational rules and safeguards by
            confering increased liability standards on those who manage and represent the deregulated
            entity.  The  functioning  of  this  system  also  requires  the  creation  of  public  agencies  which
            monitor and control the deregulated market section. Financial Supervisory Agencies are an
            example here. Such supervision can only work if the deregulated entity is submitted to strict
            rules of transparency requiring disclosure of relevant data through and adequate registration
            system and continuous reporting.

            2.   It is in this respect that it makes very much sense today to stop calling modern JSCs
            ‘anonymous companies’. It is precisely the ‘anonymity’ of the company and its shareholders
            that has been questioned by the various American, European and International legal reform
            efforts: in order to create transparent reliable governance structures in JSCs, both the
            corporate governance and shareholder structures are required to be disclosed through various
            reporting and registration devices. Modern governance guidelines recommend registered
            shares to be the exclusive form of shares. But even the bearer shares of JSCs listed on
            regulated markets require registration. So the historical term ‘anonymous companies’ should
            definitely be abandoned during a modern company law reform even if other countries might


            127   ‘SLIM’  was  the  abbreviation  of  the  first  set  of  EU  deregulation  initiatives  to  be  applied,  among  others,  in  the
            company law sector. It stands for: ‘Simpler Legislation for the Internal Market’. It resulted in the reports of the High
            Level  Group  of  Company  Law  Experts,  Simpler  legislation  for  the  internal  market  (SLIM):  a  pilot  project.
            Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. COM (96) 204 final, 8 May 1996.
                                                                             128
   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134