Page 41 - GlobalCE 1st Special Issue
P. 41
Lin, Zheng, Shen, Zheng, and Wu: Survey and Analysis of Current State of Ventilator Alarms in the Intensive Care Unit
ConFlICt oF InteRest 5. Jacques S. Breaking barriers to patient-centric alarm man-
agement. Biomed Instrument Technol 2016;50(3):181–83.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest
6. Paine CW, Goel VV, Ely E, et al. Systematic review of physiologic
involved this paper.
monitor alarm characteristics and pragmatic interventions
to reduce alarm frequency. J Hospit Med 2016;11(2):136–44.
ReFeRenCes
7. ECRI Institute. Top 10 Technology Health Hazards For 2016.
1. Lacherez P, Donaldson L, Burt JS. Do learned alarm sounds [Internet]. 2015. www.ecri.org/2016hazards.
interfere with working memory. J Hum Fact Ergonom Soc
8. Joint Commission. Medical device alarm safety in hospitals.
2016;58(7):1044–51.
Sentinel Event Alert 2013.
2. Graham K C, Cvach M. Monitor alarm fatigue: standardizing
9. Criscitelli T. Alarm management: promoting safety and es-
use of physiological monitors and decreasing nuisance
tablishing guidelines. association of operating room nurses.
alarms. Am J Crit Care 2010;19(1):28–34.
AORN J 2016;103(5):518.
3. Hooper J. Unpublished data. Washington, DC: Children’s
10. Wu M, Wu J, Liu Q, et al. Reliability and validity analysis of
National Medical Center; 2009.
the practical application of the drug information service.
4. Drew BJ, Harris P, Zègre-Hemsey JK, et al. Insights into the Comp Syst Appl 2013;(10):198–202.
problem of alarm fatigue with physiologic monitor devices: a
comprehensive observational study of consecutive intensive Correspondence may be directed to ZK Lin: 291567468@qq.com.
care unit patients. PloS One 2014;9(10):e110274.
41 J Global Clinical Engineering Special Issue 1: 37-41; 2018