Page 36 - CONSCIENCISM By Kwame Nkrumah_Neat
P. 36

30                   CONSCIENCISM                                                 PHILOSOPHY  AND  SOCIETY                3 1
                   concerns ofhuman life are differently concdved, philosophy reveals   revolution matured in his  attempt to explain nature in terms of
                   a  different bias.  And  as  society  becomes differently  organized,   nature. The second revolution consisted in his belief that the unity
                   philosophy is differently conceived. During the European Renais­  ofnature consisted not in its being. but in its materiality.
                   sance, when man became the centre of the tmiverse,  the hmnan       The  social  milieu  in  which  Thales  lived  encouraged  him  to
                   mind and the  ways  in which it might fix  the limits  of what is   insist on explaining nature in terms ofnature. In Ionia. where he
                   real  became  the  chief topics  of philosophy.  There was  a  grow­  . lived, political power was becoming entrenched in the hands of a
                   ing attempt to identify what could be with what could be known,   . mercantile class which had a vested interest in the development of
                   and  this  tendency  later  attained  its  subtlest  and  most  defmitive   nautical techniques  and techniques  of production,  for  it was  on
                   statement in the critical philosophy of Kant.  The rise  of ration­  such techniques that their prosperity hinged - more so when their
                   alism was indeed one whole stream of thought which kept reality    society later became more firmly based on slave labour. The Greeks,
                   firmly  within  the light  of human  reason,  until  in  the  writings   as Xenophon confirms in his Economics, came to regard mechanical
                   of Leibniz  processes  came  to  be  mere  analogues  in  nature  of   · arts with contempt.  But in Thales'  time, individuals, including
                   logical relations. In this way the limits of the human tmderstand­  philosophers, depended more on their own productivity for sus­
                   ing  came  to  be  identified  with  the  limits  of nature.  This  idea   tenance. Indeed, during one particularly good olive harvest, Thales
                   survives today in the notion that logically there are no mysteries,   astutely cornered  the available olive presses in Miletus  and  sub­
                   that to every question there is an answer, that there is nothing on   sequently hired them out at exorbitant rates. Owing to the change
                   earth,  beneath the  waters  or in the  heavens  above,  which is  in   in  the  structure  of society  whereby  social-political  hegemony
                   principle unknowable.                                              passed into the hands of the mercantile oligarchy,  prosperity no
                     Empiricism  too  was,  despite  its  antagonism  to  rationalism,  a   · longer depended in a crucial way on a propitiation of the gods in
                   reflection ofman's conception ofhis own position in the scheme of   connection with agriculture.  It depended  on commerce with its
                   things. It, too, sought to make the limits of what is  real coincide   ancillaries whereby the Ionian products were marketed along and
                   with  the  limits  of the  human  understanding.  For  it  tended  to   across the Mediterranean.
                   regard what is  real exclusively in terms of impressions  upon our   There  was  consequently  no  need  to  continue  to  explain  the
                   senses.                                                            world by reference to the gods.  Thales'  intellectual predecessors
                     During the European Renaissance, when man gained an increased    had invoked supernature in order to explain nature. But ifthe gods
                   appreciation of his  personal and individual dignity and freedom,   were to  be explanatory  devices  for  accounting  for  phenomena,
                   philosophy responded with disquisitions on the nature ofnatural    then there was  nothing  to  prevent the most  vicious  inequalities
                   rights  and  connected  ideas.  Philosophy  attempted  to  provide   from arising in society. Where gods are used to account for nature
                   principles which should inform any political theory, ifit is to con­  a  certain  degree  of sacerdotal  power  is  inevitable;  and  where
                   form to the Renaissance conception of man. Nor had philosophy     · priests have wielded political power, it is not only explanations of
                   in this departed from its early character. At every stage between   natural  phenomena  which  have  been  bemused  with  theology;
                   Thales  and  modern times,  philosophy was  firmly  geared on  to   theological  explanations  for  social  phenomena  have  also  been
                   what were, for the time being, conceived as primary concerns of    encouraged. With the priests securely installed as the onlyauthor­
                   life.                                                              ized  popularizers  of the  divine  will,  the  only persons  fitted  by
                     The history of Greek democracy, for example, must really be       calling and by grace to expound mystic purposes, social inequalities
                   traced to Thales.  Thales spearheaded  two revolutions.  The first   arise to fortify their exclusive role  .. And since their power is thought
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41