Page 75 - Afrika Must Unite
P. 75

6o                AFRICA  MUST  UNITE

                reigning  Government  of Britain.  We  protested  our  ability  to
                safeguard  the  rights  of our  own  people  and  were  resentful  of
                the doubts cast on our intentions.  I posed the suggestion that if
                my Government could be suspected of ulterior intentions towards
                our political opponents,  we were  equally open  to  the suspicion
                that we might abrogate the imposed constitution on the morrow
                of British departure. Where, then, was the purpose of negotiating
                a constitution ? W hy not let us frame our own Constitution ?
                  The  British  Government  was  adam ant.  They  made  it  un­
                equivocally  clear  that  unless  we  entered  into  constitutional
                negotiations they would take no further steps towards the grant
                of independence. This was the atmosphere in which we met and
                the mood in which the constitution emerged that was to tie the
                future of Ghana.  It saw the light of day,  indeed,  not  as  a legal
                instrument from our own  Ghanaian Assembly,  but as a British
                O rder in Council. Its official title was ‘The G hana (Constitution)
                O rder  in  Council,  1957’  of  the  British  Government.  It  was
                published by the British Government on  22  February  1957.
                  Some might charge that there was a good deal of emotionalism
                involved  in  our  attitude  to  the  m anner  of the  framing  of our
                constitution  for  independence.  Reviewing  it  with  the  dis­
                passionate objectiveness of three years of government under its
                provisions,  we  are  reinforced  in  our  conviction  that  only  im­
                perialist arrogance could have decided  that entrenched clauses
                are irremovable,  even under such constitutional stringencies as
                those  by  which  the  British  sought  to  tie  us  down.  Perhaps  we
                were regarded as too stupid to be able to extricate ourselves by
                constitutional  means  from  the  strait-jacket  of  the  ‘Special
                procedure for passing Bills relating to the Constitution and other
                im portant  m atters’,  in  which  the  British  strapped  us  with  the
                freedom that they ‘gave’. The British Government had decided
                that constitutional change should be made as difficult as possible
                for us, indeed almost impossible.
                  Clause 32 of our independence constitution allowed that

                  No  Bill  for  the  amendment,  modification,  repeal  or re-enact­
                  ment  of the  constitutional  provisions  of Ghana  .  .  .  shall  be
                  presented for Royal Assent unless it has endorsed on it a certi­
                  ficate under the hand of the  Speaker that the number of votes
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80