Page 19 - Banking Finance MAY 2017
P. 19

LEGAL UPDATE


          Fincorp can choose                Dispute over bottle design
          speedy remedy                     The Bombay High Court has passed an order of injunction under the Designs Act
                                            in a dispute between two plastic water bottle manu-
          A financial institution can withdraw  facturers. Cello Household Products alleged that a ri-
                           a suit for recov-  val, Modware India, is selling a product, Kudoz, with
                           ery of loans and  the same design as Cello's Puro, which is an infringe-
                           then invoke the  ment of its design and additionally, passing off. Cello
                           faster remedies  argued that its design has both novelty and original-
                           available under  ity. Agreeing with Cello and comparing the two products, the court stated that
                           special laws, the  "everything points but in one direction that Modware was attempting to de-
                           Supreme Court    ceive consumers into believing that its products came from the house of Cello.
                           stated in the    This is, therefore, prima facie, an attempt calculated to deceive and the decep-
          judgment, Himachal Pradesh Finan-  tion and misrepresentation is as to source or origin." The court made two no-
          cial Corporation vs Anil Garg. In this  table observations: The suit must now go to the commercial division according
          case, two loans were taken from the
                                            to the new Commercial Courts, Commercial Division & Commercial Appellate
          state corporation, but the borrower  Division of High Courts Act 2015. The judgment also noted that now the losing
          repaid only small amount.         party must pay costs to the winner. If the court deviates from the new rule, it
          Therefore, the corporation filed a  must provide reasons.
          regular suit before a civil judge.
          Later, it was withdrawn unilaterally  Repacking and mixing gases is not manufacturing
          because the Himachal Pradesh Pub-  The Supreme Court has dismissed the appeal of the Commissioner of Central Excise
          lic Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act                        against Vadilal Gases Ltd, raising the question whether
          provided a speedier remedy to re-                        repacking and mixing of industrial gases amounts to
                                                                   manufacture, which attracts higher duty under the Tar-
          cover loans. The borrower chal-
          lenged this move in the high court,                      iff Act. According to the law, labelling or relabelling of
                                                                   containers and repacking from bulk packs to retail packs
          arguing that once the suit was with-
          drawn, the corporation can be pre-                       or the adoption of any other treatment to render the
          sumed to have abandoned its claim.  product marketable to the consumer, shall amount to 'manufacture'.
                                            In this case, the company received liquefied nitrogen and argon in bulk in cryo-
          The high court allowed the petition
          and stopped the auction of the mort-  genic tankers. They are re-gassified and packed in smaller cylinders for retail sale.
                                            Some other gases are also repacked and labelled with details by the sister com-
          gaged vehicles. The financial corpo-  pany which does the marketing. The court noted, after examining the process in
          ration appealed to the Supreme
                                            this case, that there was no manufacturing involved.
          Court contending that it had not
          abandoned the claim but the with-  Calcutta HC asks land acquisition collectors to pay
          drawal was made to initiate fresh
          proceedings under the Act, as it pro-  compensation
          vided for a more speedy and effec-  The Calcutta High Court has asked the West Bengal government and the land
          tive remedy, under a special law.  acquisition collector to pay compensation and occupation charges to Punalur
                                            Paper Mills for occupying its premises in central Kolkata since 1998 through an
          The Supreme Court allowed the auc-
                                            illegal land acquisition. The premises were acquired in 1973 for the offices of
          tion stating that the withdrawal of  Sugar Industries Development Corporation and the notification expired in 1998.
          suit did not bar a fresh petition un-  Then by another notification in 2000, the premises were acquired while the
          der the Act. "The loan was disbursed  corporation continued to hold the property. The mills challenged the acquisition
          from public funds of the taxpayers'  invoking the urgency clause, while the government justified it and blamed the
          money. The borrower was a trustee  mills for not allowing it to measure the premises. It also raised objection to a
          for the loan amount. It could not  sick company to approach the high court. Rejecting these arguments, the high
          become a windfall for him," the judg-  court observed that no compensation was paid and there was no urgency when
          ment said.
                                            the premises were occupied for long years.

            BANKING FINANCE |                                                                  MAY | 2017 | 19








                      Sashi Publications Pvt Ltd Call 8443808873/ 8232083010
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24