Page 48 - Banking Fiannce March 2018
P. 48

FEATURE

         February 2017 to Hong Kong branches of Allahabad Bank  So, do the banks that provide this facility on the
         and Axis Bank without authorisation.                 basis of an LoU have no responsibility?
                                                              Bankers say the bank receiving an LoU sends a letter of
         The alleged fraud continued for seven long           confirmation to the issuing branch and its controlling offices.
         years without being detected. How?                   It is not clear whether receiving banks such as Axis Bank,
         How — and how a handful of staffers could game the system  Allahabad Bank and Union Bank sent such letters. And if they
         — is baffling. The investigation should reveal details, but it  did, the question is why no alarm was raised in PNB. It could
         seems reasonable to assume that the fraud could have gone  be that the receiving banks didn’t send the confirmation
         on for so long only with the active collusion of a ring of  letter. Or it could be that the letters were buried at PNB.
         officials. One of the bankers now under arrest reportedly
         handled transactions to provide credit to Nirav Modi’s firms  The RBI said that the fraud in PNB was the
         for seven years — in violation of the normal practice of result of delinquent behaviour by some
         transfers every two or three years. SBI Chairman Rajnish  employees, and the failure of internal controls.
         Kumar said, “We don’t keep a person for more than three  What are these internal controls?
         years at one position. There are certain positions which are
                                                              Some have been listed in the answer to the question above
         very sensitive and we monitor those positions very closely.
                                                              on how the fraud went on for so long. Ideally, SWIFT
         Banking is a risky business.”
                                                              messages should have been checked by senior officials in
                                                              charge of the credit, investment or treasury departments
         Again, in PNB’s case, one out of the three persons that  that handle the foreign exchange business.
         banks typically task to transmit SWIFT messages carried out
         two roles, according to investigators. Also, several bankers  Whenever such huge amounts are sent through SWIFT, daily
         wonder how the delinking of SWIFT from CBS could have  reports are generated. All banks, including PNB, have
         been achieved without it being detected by the bank’s  vigilance departments and fraud management committees.
         information technology department.                   Banks also have internal branch audits and concurrent audits
                                                              involving external auditors. They also have risk management
         These suggest a possible compromising of the sanctity of  and audit committees at the Board level to ensure
         passwords or authentication, and the breaching of    compliance. The failure of all these controls is a serious
         information technology systems. And the fact that at the  concern, also because PNB had been hurt badly because of
         very beginning, the approval for issuance of LoUs — whether  lending in the past to Winsome Diamonds, which is now
         forged or otherwise — for such huge amounts without it  listed as one of India’s top defaulters.
         being captured in the system or red-flagged, indicates a
         major failure of internal control systems.           What is the responsibility of the RBI itself?
                                                              Bankers say all LoUs have to be reported to RBI on a
         OK, in the normal course, how do the banks           quarterly basis. It is not clear if the regulator’s inspection
                                                              of the bank’s books revealed anything earlier. Till a few years
         that lend to a company on the basis of LoUs, get
                                                              ago, RBI used to inspect branches of banks, but it has now
         their money back?                                    switched more to offsite monitoring. Successive RBI
         Banks approach the lender that has issued the LoU —  Governors have written to the government about the
         because these are commitments made by the issuing bank  conflict involved in having a central banker sitting on the
         on behalf of a customer. Many banks receive their funds at  Board of a bank that RBI regulates. But the government
         the end of the 90-day period, after which fresh LoUs  insists that having a regulatory representative helps with
         may be generated, often to keep payments to banks going.  checks and balances. This has led to debates on the
         The investigation will look at allegedly forged LoUs that seem  accountability of the government, which owns many banks.
         to have helped the firms secure funding for long. The liability  On Friday, the RBI said it had already undertaken a
         for these LoUs is being contested by PNB — but other banks  supervisory assessment of control systems in PNB, and would
         are unanimous that it must honour the undertaking it gave.  take appropriate supervisory action.


            48 | 2018 | MARCH                                                              | BANKING FINANCE
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53