Page 17 - BANKING FINANCE JULY 2016
P. 17

LEGAL UPDATE

Company and directors can be prosecuted for cheque                                         2005 notification on
                                                                                           Mines Department
bounce in bank                                                                             striped by Punjab HC

The Bombay High Court has ruled that      judgment which had held that Section             The Punjab and Haryana High Court
a company and its directors can be        446(1) of the Companies Act, dealing             has struck down a 2005 notification
prosecuted for issuing a                                                                   of the Mines Department of the
cheque which gets                                       with winding up compa-             Haryana government increasing the
dishonoured by a bank even                              nies, has no application to        rate of royalty 50 per cent, from Rs
if the company is facing wind-                          proceedings under the Ne-          24 per tonne to Rs 36 per tonne and
ing up proceedings under the Compa-                     gotiable Instruments Act           also enhancing the rate of dead rent
nies Act 1956.                            and therefore it is not necessary to             to Rs 2,000 per hectare. The higher
                                          obtain the consent of the company                rate was notified amending the
It is not necessary to get the assent of  court.                                           schedule to the central law, the
the company judge to prosecute the                                                         Mines and Minerals (Regulation and
accused persons under Section 138 of      The matter involved the interpretation           Development) Act.
the Negotiable Instruments Act which      of Section 446(1) which says that when
deals with bounced cheques as a crimi-    a winding up order has been made or              The minor mineral companies, which
nal offence. There were two contra-       an official liquidator has been ap-              have existing leases, argued that the
dicting judgments on this point in the    pointed "no suit or other legal pro-             rates have been fixed in their seven-
Bombay high court.                        ceeding shall be commenced." The                 year contracts with the Haryana
                                          question was whether the phrase in-              government and they cannot be
Therefore, the issue was referred to a    cluded criminal proceedings like                 changed midway. There was no em-
larger bench in the case, Indorama        cheque bounce. The high court said               pirical data to justify the hike and
Synthetics Ltd vs State of Maharashtra.   no, which means they can be taken                therefore it was arbitrary, it was
It upheld the view expressed in the       forward.                                         contended.

Bid conditions can't be read 'literally'                                                   Accepting the arguments, the high
                                                                                           court stated, in its judgment in the
The Delhi High Court has asked Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) not to               case Faridabad Gurgaon Minerals vs
                           reject the bid of Quippo Oil & Gas Infrastructure Ltd in-       State of Haryana, "The contract was
                           voking non-essential conditions for eligibility in bidding for  a statutory contract. It was obliga-
                           deployment of drilling rigs and carrying out of 3D seismic      tory on the state to incorporate the
                           survey.                                                         statutory terms CWP No. 17958 of
                                                                                           2005 which it intended to bind the
The financial criteria of ONGC insisted on 100 per cent. Quippo argued that the            contracting party, but having for-
margin was minimal, not relevant to the execution of the project and was dis-              saken such a course it cannot jump
criminatory. Agreeing with it, the court stated that "the condition is not an es-          the statutory gun on the contracting
sential condition but merely ancillary and subsidiary with the main object to be           party to enforce terms which were
achieved and ONGC cannot insist upon strict literal compliance of the condition."          not visualised in the contract. In-
                                                                                           deed, it is a case where the state
Supreme Court rejects PIL for WhatsApp ban                                                 fettered its own powers either
                                                                                           through neglect or convenience."
WhatsApp's end-to-end encryption might still be a contentious issue, but the
Supreme Court refused to allow a PIL seeking a ban on the popular app and
similar messenger services.The PIL, filed by Gurugram-based RTI activist Sudhir
Yadav, said these apps have complete encryption, which poses a threat to the
country's security.

A bench of Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justice A M Khanwilkar rejected the PIL,
suggesting Yadav could approach the government or Telecom Regulatory Au-
thority of India (TRAI) with his plea. But Yadav said his application to the de-
partment of telecommunication and the government got the response that they
did not possess information in this regard.

BANKING FINANCE |                                                                          JULY | 2016 | 17

Copyright@ The Insurance Times. 09883398055 / 09883380339
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22