Page 263 - Basic _ Clinical Pharmacology ( PDFDrive )
P. 263

CHAPTER 14  Agents Used in Cardiac Arrhythmias        249


                    4. Question the need for therapy. The mere identification of   pointes. Treatment for torsades requires recognition of the arrhyth-
                      an abnormality of cardiac rhythm does not necessarily require   mia, withdrawal of any offending agent, correction of hypokale-
                      that the arrhythmia be treated. An excellent justification for   mia, and treatment with maneuvers to increase heart rate (pacing
                      conservative treatment was provided by the Cardiac Arrhyth-  or  isoproterenol);  intravenous magnesium also  appears  effective,
                      mia Suppression Trial (CAST) referred to earlier.  even in patients with normal magnesium levels.
                                                                           Drugs that markedly slow conduction, such as flecainide,
                    Benefits & Risks                                     or high concentrations of quinidine can result in an increased
                                                                         frequency of reentry arrhythmias, notably ventricular tachycardia
                    The benefits of antiarrhythmic therapy are difficult to establish.   in patients with prior myocardial infarction in whom a potential
                    Two types of benefits can be envisioned: reduction of arrhythmia-  reentry circuit may be present. Treatment here consists of recogni-
                    related symptoms, such as palpitations, syncope, or cardiac arrest;   tion, withdrawal of the offending agent, and intravenous sodium
                    and reduction in long-term mortality in asymptomatic patients.   to reverse unidirectional block.
                    Among drugs discussed here, only β blockers have been definitely
                    associated with reduction of mortality in relatively asymptomatic   Conduct of Antiarrhythmic Therapy
                    patients, and the mechanism underlying this effect is not estab-
                    lished (see Chapter 10).                             The urgency of the clinical situation determines the route and
                       Antiarrhythmic therapy carries with it a number of risks. In   rate of drug initiation. When immediate drug action is required,
                    some cases, the risk of an adverse reaction is clearly related to high   the intravenous route is preferred. Therapeutic drug levels can be
                    dosages or plasma concentrations. Examples include lidocaine-  achieved by administration of multiple slow intravenous boluses.
                    induced tremor or quinidine-induced cinchonism. In other cases,   Drug therapy can be considered effective when the target arrhyth-
                    adverse reactions are unrelated to high plasma concentrations   mia is suppressed (according to the measure used to quantify it at
                    (eg, procainamide-induced agranulocytosis). For many serious   baseline) and toxicities are absent. Conversely, drug therapy should
                    adverse reactions to antiarrhythmic drugs, the combination of drug   not be considered ineffective unless toxicities occur at a time when
                    therapy and the underlying heart disease appears important.  arrhythmias are not suppressed.
                       Several specific syndromes of arrhythmia provocation by antiar-  Monitoring plasma drug concentrations can be a useful
                    rhythmic drugs have also been identified, each with its underly-  adjunct to managing antiarrhythmic therapy. Plasma drug con-
                    ing pathophysiologic mechanism and risk factors. Drugs such as   centrations are also important in establishing compliance during
                    quinidine, sotalol, ibutilide, and dofetilide, which act—at least   long-term therapy as well as in detecting drug interactions that
                    in part—by slowing repolarization and prolonging cardiac action   may result in very high concentrations at low drug dosages or very
                    potentials, can result in marked QT prolongation and torsades de   low concentrations at high dosages.



                       Antiarrhythmic Drug-Use Principles Applied to Atrial Fibrillation


                       Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia   (maintenance of ventricular rate in the range of 60–80 bpm) has
                       observed clinically. Its prevalence increases from approximately   a better benefit-to-risk outcome than rhythm control (conversion
                       0.5% in individuals younger than 65 years of age to 10% in indi-  to normal sinus rhythm) in the long-term health of patients with
                       viduals older than 80. Diagnosis is usually straightforward by   atrial fibrillation. If rhythm control is deemed desirable, sinus
                       means of an ECG. The ECG may also enable the identification of a   rhythm is usually restored by DC cardioversion in the USA. This is
                       prior myocardial infarction, left ventricular hypertrophy, and ven-  also the preferred strategy in an emergency, eg, atrial fibrillation
                       tricular pre-excitation. Hyperthyroidism is an important treatable   associated with hypotension or angina. For the elective restora-
                       cause of atrial fibrillation, and a thyroid panel should be obtained   tion of sinus rhythm, a single large oral dose of propefenone or
                       at the time of diagnosis to exclude this possibility. With the clini-  flecainide may be used, provided that safety is initially docu-
                       cal history and physical examination as a guide, the presence and   mented in a monitored setting. Intravenous ibutilide can also
                       extent of the underlying heart disease should be evaluated, pref-  restore sinus rhythm promptly.
                       erably using noninvasive techniques such as echocardiography.  The selection of a drug to maintain normal sinus rhythm
                         Treatment of atrial fibrillation is initiated to relieve patient   depends on the presence and type of underlying heart disease.
                       symptoms and prevent the complications of thromboembolism   An example of an algorithm for drug selection is given in
                       and tachycardia-induced heart failure, the result of prolonged   Figure 14–11.
                       uncontrolled heart rates. The initial treatment objective is con-  Antiarrhythmic drugs remain the preferred rhythm control
                       trol of the ventricular rate. This is usually achieved by use of a   strategy. However, a comparison of initial strategies for the mainte-
                       calcium channel-blocking drug alone or in combination with a   nance of normal sinus rhythm is currently undergoing clinical trial.
                       β-adrenergic blocker. Digoxin may be of value in the presence of   The pivotal role of oral anticoagulation in the prevention of stroke
                       heart failure. A second objective is a restoration and maintenance   is established. Currently guidelines identify patients who are at
                       of normal sinus rhythm. Several studies show that rate control   particular risk and should undergo long-term anticoagulation.
   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268