Page 316 - The Social Animal
P. 316

298 The Social Animal


           turned green. But what happened when the pedestrian was on
           crutches? Apparently, seeing a person on crutches evoked an em-
           pathic response; the feeling of empathy overwhelmed the desire to
           be aggressive, and the percentage of people honking their horns de-
           creased dramatically. 111
               Empathy is an important phenomenon. Seymour Feshbach  112
           notes that most people find it difficult to inflict pain purposely on
           another human being unless they can find some way of dehumaniz-
           ing their victim. Thus, when our nation was fighting wars against
           Asians (Japanese in the 1940s, Koreans in the 1950s, Vietnamese in
           the 1960s), our military personnel frequently referred to them as
           “gooks.” We see this use of dehumanization as a way of justifying acts
           of cruelty. It is easier to commit violent acts against a “gook” than it
           is to commit violent acts against a fellow human being. As I have
           noted time and again in this book, this kind of self-justification not
           only makes it possible for us to aggress against another person, but
           it also guarantees that we will continue to aggress against that per-
           son. Recall the example of the schoolteacher living in Kent, Ohio,
           who, after the killing of four Kent State students by Ohio National
           Guardsmen, told author James Michener 113  that anyone who walks
           on the street barefoot deserves to die. This kind of statement is
           bizarre on the face of it; we begin to understand it only when we re-
           alize that it was made by someone who had already succeeded in de-
           humanizing the victims of this tragedy.
               We can deplore the process of dehumanization, but at the same
           time, an understanding of the process can help us to reverse it.
           Specifically, if it is true that most individuals must dehumanize their
           victims to commit an extreme act of aggression, then, by building
           empathy among people, aggressive acts will become more difficult to
           commit. Indeed, Norma and Seymour Feshbach   114  have demon-
           strated a negative correlation between empathy and aggression in
           children: The more empathy a person has, the less he or she resorts
           to aggressive actions. Subsequently, Norma Feshbach developed a
           method of teaching empathy and successfully tested its effects on ag-
           gression. 115  Briefly, she taught primary-school children how to take
           the perspective of another. The children were trained to identify dif-
           ferent emotions in people, they played the role of other people in var-
           ious emotionally laden situations, and they explored (in a group)
           their own feelings. These “empathy training activities” led to signif-
   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321