Page 336 - The Social Animal
P. 336

318 The Social Animal


           set, men were more likely than women to come back and win the sec-
           ond and third sets. Women were more likely to lose a match in
           straight sets. This phenomenon occurs even among professional ten-
           nis players, who surely regard themselves as talented and able.
               Marlene Turner and Anthony Pratkanis carried the notion of
                                                   34
           debilitating self-attributions a step further by demonstrating that
           negative attributions generated by the manner in which women are
           selected for a job can impede their actual performance on the job.
           Specifically, Turner and Pratkanis were interested in investigating
           some possible unfortunate side effects of affirmative action pro-
           grams. Affirmative action programs have been generally beneficial,
           inasmuch as they have created employment opportunities for tal-
           ented women who had been previously overlooked when applying
           for high-level jobs. Unfortunately, there can be a downside, as well:
           Some of these programs unintentionally stigmatized talented women
           by creating the illusion that they were selected primarily because of
           their gender rather than their talent. What effect does this have on
           the women involved? In a well-controlled experiment, Turner and
           Pratkanis led some women to believe that they were selected for a job
           because they needed to hire more women, while others were given a
           difficult test and were then told they were selected for that job on the
           basis of their high performance on the test. Those women who were
           told they were selected because of their sex (not their merit) later
           denigrated their own abilities. In addition, they tended to engage in
           self-handicapping behaviors; that is, when the task required a great
           deal of effort, the women who believed they were selected because of
           their sex simply did not try as hard as the women who believed they
           had been selected because of their abilities.


           Self-fulfilling Prophecies Even if we never find ourselves in
           the position of interviewers who have the power to hire people who
           are unlike us, we interact with all kinds of people every day—men,
           women, young people, old people, blacks, whites, Asians, Latinos,
           straight people, gay men and lesbians, fat people, thin people, Mus-
           lims, Catholics, Jews, and so on. And our preconceptions about what
           they’re like often influence our behaviors in such a way as to elicit
           from them the very characteristics and behaviors we expected in the
           first place. I have referred to the phenomenon elsewhere as the self-
           fulfilling prophecy. For example, imagine that you and I had never
   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341