Page 456 - The Social Animal

Notes

Chapter 1 What Is Social Psychology?
1. Michener, J. (1971). Kent State: What happened and why. New York: Random House.
2. Clark, K., & Clark, M. (1947). Racial identification and preference in Negro children.
In T. M. Newcomb & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 169–178).
New York: Holt.
3. Harris, J. (1970). Hiroshima: A study in science, politics, and the ethics of war. Menlo Park,
CA: Addison-Wesley.

4. Powell, J. L. (1988). A test of the knew-it-all-along effect in the 1984 presidential and
statewide elections. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 760–773.
5. Michener, J. (1971). Kent State: What happened and why. New York: Random House.
6. E. Berscheid, personal communication.
7. Zimbardo, P. (1971, October 25). The psychological power and pathology of imprison-
ment (p. 3). Statement prepared for the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on
the Judiciary; Subcommittee No. 3: Hearings on Prison Reform, San Francisco.

Chapter 2 Conformity
1. Copyright © 1933, 1961 by James Thurber. From “The day the dam broke,” in My life
and hard times (New York: Harper, 1933), pp. 41, 47. (Originally printed in The New
Yorker.)
2. Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and
Social Psychology, 46, 190–207.
3. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. W. (1991). Group member’s reaction to opinion devi-
ates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and of environ-
mental noise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 212–225.
4. Speer, A. (1970). Inside the Third Reich: Memoirs. (R. Winston & C. Winston, Trans.).
New York: Macmillan.
5. Playboy, January 1975, p. 78.
6. Kruglanski, A. W. (1986, August). Freeze-think and the Challenger. Psychology Today,
pp. 48–49.