Page 207 - Bundle for MF Final
P. 207

Bates no   206







                                                                                      CLAIM NO F00BN141
                                                                       FIRST DEFENDANT'S POSITION STATEMENT

                   4. SOURCE OF THE CLAIMANT'S FUNDING

                    27     The Claimant initially expected to receive between £2,000,000 and £4,000,000 12
                           in compensation for what was little more than a minor hand injury and bruising to
                           his ribs and shoulder (See McKApp paragraph 5.1). Once he learned that Diamond
                           Insurance had admitted liability, his complaints of debilitating tinnitus appeared
                           ( "like an AC/CD concert being in his head all day') that  "put his passen at risk".
                           By its nature, tinnitus is largely self-diagnosed, and the Claimant exaggerated his.

                    28     He then set on a course to maximise his compensation  (See the "Next Big One"
                           Exhibit C) and lied to his solicitors, insurers and advisors to achieve this.  He was
                           confident that, at the right time, he could pass all medical examinations and get his
                           pilot's licence reinstated.

                    29     Soon after Diamond Insurance paid out a total of £469,000, the Claimant threw
                           out his medication and said,  "I won't be needing this anymore"

                     30    The Claimant swore a number of iterations of the SCHEDULE [for the High Court]
                           which he knew to be false.  His certification was as follows:

                           "loss of earnings and benefits
                           For the avoidance of doubt and in the spirit of openness, the claimant confirms
                           that he has rece insurance payments.  Lump sum payments have been made for
                           the loss of his lice but under polici for which he himself paid  These are
                           therefre irrevant to the claim.  He has also receved income replacement
                           insurance, but the policy required him to make a subrogted claim on behalf of the
                           insure  The claim is therefore for his full loss

                                                                                  13
                           This wording conceals the fact that he had received £525,397.60 compensation
                           under a personal accident policy (not a loss of licence) funded by easyJet (not by
                           "himself'). The Claimant admits concealing it.

                     31    The AIG policy is highly relevant because it duplicates the Diamond Insurance
                           coverage.  In an email dated  7 October 2017 at 10.46, when he had little other
                                                     th
                           option but to tell the truth, the Claimant emailed the FD's father (see McKApp
                           paragraph 99 et seq).

                      I also received an accident Insurance payout from AIG through EasyJets company accident insurance which I haven't
                      mentioned to KN simply because they never asked for it. When KN asked for all records from HR in EasyJet they
                      have only supplied them my loss of llsence payouts from Hiscox and EasyJet, the AIG payout has not been
                      mentioned. I might be wrong here not disclosing AIG payout of £534000, but I wanted KN to maximise my claim In
                      the way of not finding excuses letting the Defendant off lightly.

                     32    This is a clear admission of fraud, perjury and his intent to mislead his legal and
                           other advisers.

                     33    The Claimant was worried - bordering on paranoia - that Diamond Insurance was
                           keeping him under surveillance, had accessed his bank accounts and would require
                           detailed financial disclosures, possibly on oath.



                    12  Which puts the £500,000  "gifi" into context
                    13  On 26th October 2016
   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212