Page 211 - Bundle for MF Final

Bates no 210

CLAIM NO F00BN141
FIRST DEFENDANT'S POSITION STATEMENT

allocated 50% of the shares to her. After he decamped, and without any
discussion, he removed her as director and snatched back her shares. He had done
almost the same in his divorce from his first wife with her Cruisin' shares (see
McKApp paragraph 218). The Claimant appears to be a magnet for deja vu.

56 He also gave her the FD his deceased mother's wedding ring but is currently trying
to snatch it back on the grounds that is wanted urgently by his siblings. In truth it
has probably been earmarked for his current bride to be.

9. CONCLUSIONS
57 The FDs ex-legal advisers repeatedly cautioned her that TOLA TA type actions were
a "minefield" which were extremely hazardous to defend. She listened carefully to
the advice but has decided to fight on principle 24 •

58 The evidence shows that this claim is contrived, false, fraudulent and a contempt of
Court. He has used the legal process as a weapon to harass the FD and her family,
including a false Order that required her to disclose privileged information relating
to her divorce hearings (see Exhibit D). It was also sent to the Second Defendant
who planned to comply.

59 The Claimant has put the FD's entire family- and especially her children and aged
and ailing parents - under unbearable pressure through his cynical pattern of
dishonesty and deception. This should not escape unpunished. He appears to
have new victim in his pipeline.

th
Dated this 24 January 2020

Louise Siggers Michael Comer
Litigant in Person McKenzie Friend Applicant

Q)
b!)
(0
0..
i, The Claimant has another victim in the pipeline