Page 157 - MJC submissions
P. 157

Analysis of AWVC Planning Committee’s Chairperson to Letter of 1  October 2018
                                                                                        st




                 AWVC Email                                   Comments

                 Dear Mr Comer,
                 Thank you for your email. Jenny Forbes has seen  Not prepared to meet and discuss. Great for an
                 your correspondence and has the following    elected representative. Will be different when it’s
                 comments:                                    election time!
                 I do not accept that the NP is invalid, or that it   Were Ms Forbes comments agreed by other
                 contains errors. In preparing the Plan, we were   members of the Planning Committee
                 advised and guided by an independent
                 Consultant as well as the officers at MSDC.

                 The draft Plan and supporting documents went   Does not justify figures—focuses on process
                 through consultations with statutory consultees
                 and residents and were examined by an
                 Independent Examiner, who also visited the sites
                 mentioned in the Plan.

                 The site assessment process and Sustainability
                 Appraisal followed the appropriate
                 methodology.


                 The Plan complies with all the legal requirements
                 set out in the Localism Act 2011.
                 The supporting documents cannot be re-written,   This implies that Ms Forbes accepts the
                 as they form the background documents to the   calculations are incorrect.
                 Plan.

                 Amendment of the Plan itself would involve
                 more consultations, another Examination and   Why so----
                 another Referendum.
                 With regard to density, the Wealden House site   Where  is this recorded?
                 was assessed by MSDC (prior to the
                 Neighbourhood Plan) as a site with a potential   Mr King says he had no input into the AWNP
                 for flatted developments at a density of 50-100
                 dwellings per hectare


                 This was taken into account during the site
                 assessment process.

                                                              Then whoever does it needs to be Tommy
                 The developers will have to show that their   Cooper or Dynamo.
                 proposal makes efficient use of land (as required
                 by the NPPF) but also that it does this without
                 compromising the character of the area.

                                                              But expect this to be overruled by MSDC based
                 The Village Council has already responded to   on the AWNP
                 their planning application and objected to it in
                 detail.
   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162