Page 201 - MJC submissions
P. 201
I have other concerns over entries -or absence of them- on the MSDC website;
The omitted pre-application consultation file;
The initiating correspondence with Caylx Environmental Ltd;
th
The omission of plans produced at the meeting of 15 October 2018 “showing the
existing commercial building and hard standing and the revised typical elevation”
i
The result of your further site survey;
The viability assessment relating to social units;
Mr Dorman’s written comments on the sketch plan provided by the applicant
Request for advice from Leisure Services;
Additional letter for extension of time:
My revised submission of 16 July 2018.
th
I urge you to disclose the above and respond to the questions raised in my letter of 9
th
October 2018.
Finally, I repeat that I do not oppose the development of the WH:LIC and WH:EDF sites but
object to your attitude and repeated breaches of process. I urge you to afford me and other
opponents of the planned developments equality of hearing before your report is finalised
and to confirm that the final decision will be taken by the Planning Committee.
Yours sincerely,
MJ Comer
Page 8