Page 27 - The People of the State of New York v. M. Robert Neulander - Brief for Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendant-Respondent
P. 27

of
                                                                       21.






                                                                                          suspect herself.


                                    instruction to be sure of
                              sophisticated concept of
                                                                                                                                      juror misconduct," 570 P





                              reasonable doubt.
                                                                                    prejudice arising from these kinds of
                                                           and resisted producing her cell phone.
                                                                                                                         potential subjective inflm.mce on other
          22
                                                                                                                         jurors.






                                                                                                                                            Court held that "[i]t is well settled that a presumption of
                                    guilt, rather than an imprecation to convict.
                    its inappropriate nature, as even the trial court seemed to recognize.
                            than that it "was  just my dad being [my] dad," A-20, whatever that means.
                              Juror 12 gave no explanation of
                                                                             held "ambiguous, innocuous and irrelevant," as the People allege.
                    A.24.
                                                                                                                         570 P.2d at 1053-54.
                                                                                                      a text terming Mr. Neulander "the scary man"; and Juror 12's receipt of

                                                                                          There is no way for the People to rebut the presumption of
                                                                                                expressing shock that Jenna Neulander, a critical defense witness, was not a
                                                                                                      a text
                         testimony that she forgot about the text before it was later extracted from her phone can be
                                       6  The People posit that the statement, "Make sure he's guilty!," could possibly be read as an
                                              case with a friend, ignoring the "basic admonition not to talk about the case with
                                                                                    improper communications, which cannot be
                              the statement other
                                                     In an analogous case, People v. Fox, 172 A.D.2d 218, a juror discussed the
                                                                             People's Br. at
                      ignored. The very fact that she saw fit to delete this text clearly demonstrated her consciousness
                                                                                                                                      .2d at 1052, and that the government could not rebut this
                                    People's Br. at 27-28.  It is
                                                                                                                                            prejudice arises from any
                                                                 had engaged in serious misconduct when she tried selectively to delete these texts,
                                 highly unlikely, however, that Juror 12's father would have texted her a message concerning the
                                                                                                                                presumption, because it was based on the juror's possible subjective beliefs and/or
                                                                                                                   Similarly, in this case, the clock cannot be turned back on the admonition by
                            Moreover, Juror 12's
                                                                                                             Juror 12's father to "Make sure he's guilty"; 6  on Juror 12's acquiescent response to
                                                                       This is particularly true since Juror 12 demonstrated her understanding that she
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32