Page 8 - SFHN619finalSP.qxp_SFHN 0608 Friday 5.0
P. 8

Helping Physicians Maximize Their Shared Savings

                                                    Through Voluntary Alignment



               As Accountable Care Organizations                                 his or her cardiologist as the doctor   often benefit from a 20% to 30%
             (ACOs) continue to evolve, the                                      who delivered the most care, then the   increase in Medicare fee-for-service
             Centers for Medicare & Medicaid                                     cardiologist would be considered the   patients attributed to their care.
             Services (CMS) continue to encour-                                  patient’s “primary physician.”      That can mean tens of thousands of
             age physicians to assume financial                                    Now, with voluntary alignment,   dollars in incremental revenue – not
             risk for the patients attributed to their                           patients can identify their primary   only from shared savings, but also
             ACO. In fact, the most recent changes                               physician on their own, independent   from performance bonuses that
             by CMS incentivize ACOs to assume                                   of claims data. This ensures patients’   Genuine Health ACO pays to its par-
             greater upside risk by minimizing                                   primary care doctors – those who   ticipating physicians when they meet
             downside risk.                                                      likely have the most thorough and   certain criteria. In addition, our par-
               These models are based on compar-                                 holistic understanding of the patient’s   ticipating physicians earn higher
             ing the actual cost of care for a                                   health – serve as the “captain” of   reimbursement for their patients
             defined population of Medicare fee-                                 patient’s care team.              attributed to our ACO.
             for-service beneficiaries with the      BY GAMIL KHARFAN                                                ACOs offer a win-win for Medicare
             anticipated cost for delivering care to                                                               fee-for-service beneficiaries and their
             that same population. If the actual   organizations, the greater the oppor-  How Does A Patient Align   primary care providers. However, it’s
             costs are less than the anticipated   tunity to demonstrate savings.   With A PCP?                    vital these patients are attributed to
             costs, then the ACO – and its physi-  Likewise, for the physicians who   This concept of voluntary align-  the correct doctor. And Genuine
             cian members – share in the savings.   comprise these ACOs, patient attribu-  ment makes good sense for patients   Health ACO has created a voluntary
               Those ACOs with well-conceived   tion can mean significantly greater   as well as their physicians. However,   alignment program to make certain
             and well-deployed care management   income.                         as is the case with many Medicare-  our participating physicians get the
             programs can often achieve signifi-                                 related enterprises, bureaucracy can   credit and the income for every
             cant savings and earn handsome                                      make     processes   challenging.  patient possible.
             bonuses. From robust preventive   Voluntary Alignment Trumps        Voluntary alignment is no exception
             care, to post-discharge follow up, to   Claims Data                 to the rule.                        Learn more how Genuine Health ACO
             ensuring medication adherence, suc-  Historically, a Medicare fee-for-ser-  For this reason, at Genuine Health   can help streamline the voluntary align-
             cessful ACOs produce better health   vice beneficiary who elects to partici-  ACO, we’ve created a program specif-  ment process for your practice by
             outcomes, prevent hospitalizations,   pate in an ACO would be aligned   ically focused on voluntary align-   contacting Gamil Kharfan, Chief
             and reduce overall healthcare spend-  with the doctor who provided the   ment. We do the heavy lifting so our   Growth Officer for Genuine Health, at
             ing.                              most care to that patient over the pre-  physicians and their office staff don’t    (786) 878-5500, or
               For these forward-looking ACOs,   vious twelve months. Therefore, if a   have to. As a result, physicians who   gkharfan@genuinehealthgroup.com.
             the more patients attributed to their   patient’s Medicare claim data shows   participate in Genuine Health ACO







                                   Telehealth in Florida; Has Its Day Finally Come?



          The 2019 session of the Florida Legislature addressed an issue that has              consistent with his or her scope of practice … for a health care pro-
        become increasingly problematic for physicians trying to deliver cost                  fessional who provides in-person health care services to patients in
        effective, quality, and responsive medical services – the growing demand               this state.” Thus, the standard of care is no different whether treating
        for telehealth. In addition to potential cost and timeliness benefits, the             a patient using telehealth or in-person.
        public’s acceptance of and expectation for telehealth services reflects the              - Place of Service. The place of service where a professional tele-
        increasing trend towards consumerism in this industry. Specifically, the               health service is rendered is the location where the patient is located
        tendency to provide health care services in locations that are responsive              at the time services are performed or in their county of residence in
        to consumers’ preferences, while protecting their safety.                              Florida. This is likely to prove to be problematic. For example, imag-
          The 2019 Florida Legislature tried to address many of the questions                  ine while driving through Palm Beach County a resident of Miami-
        surrounding the delivery of professional medical services using tele-                  Dade County engages in a telehealth consultation with a telehealth
        health by adopting HB 23, which created § 456.47, Florida Statutes- Use                provider located in Hillsborough County, who allegedly
        of telehealth to provide services (“Telehealth Act”).                                  misreads/misinterprets/fails to adequately explain a test result; would
          The Florida Legislature elected to use the term “telehealth”, rather                 the place of service for any resulting malpractice suit be Palm Beach
        than “telemedicine”, to mean “… the use of synchronous or asynchro-  BY STEPHEN H. SIEGEL,   or Miami-Dade County?
        nous telecommunications technology by a telehealth provider to provide   ESQ.            The Telehealth Act represents the first step in clarifying the use of
        health care services, including, but not limited to, assessment, diagnosis,            this health care delivery method in Florida. However, it is not as com-
        consultation, treatment and monitoring of a patient; transfer of medical data; patient   prehensive as some may have hoped. For one thing, there still are limitations on the
        and professional health-related education; public health services; and health admin-  services physicians may deliver via telehealth. For example, a qualified ordering
        istration. The term does not include audio-only telephone calls, e-mail messages, or   physician still may not authorize a qualified patient to obtain or reauthorize that
        facsimile transmissions.” Thus, the Florida Legislature recognized that telehealth may   patient’s continued use of medical cannabis.
        be employed in a wide variety of situations.                               Probably more disappointing, the Telehealth Act did not clearly address a major
          The definition of who qualifies as a “telehealth provider”, is surprisingly broad and   hurdle to the development of this delivery modality in Florida – reimbursement. The
        includes any individual who –                                             Act only requires a telehealth provider and payer to develop “mutually acceptable
          1. provides health care and related services using telehealth and who is licensed or   payment rates or payment methodologies for” telehealth services. This, essentially, is
        certified under one of variety of Florida statutory schemes;              what Florida’s physicians have been doing historically. The Act does not require pay-
          2. is licensed under a multi-state health care licensure compact of which Florida is   ers to reimburse physicians for providing telehealth services; thus, a payer may elect
        a member state; or                                                        not to cover these services. The Act also does not require parity or any relationship
          3. is licensed in another state, providing services to a patient in Florida, registered   between what a payer reimburses a physician for an in-person visit and reimburse-
        under and complies with the requirements of the applicable Florida board or depart-  ment for a telehealth visit. Thus, the Legislature failed to address an issue many view
        ment, and meets Florida’s financial responsibility requirements.          as critical to the development of a robust telehealth delivery system.
          Historically, the Florida’s boards, particularly the Board of Medicine, have taken the   The good news is the Florida Legislature will be back in 2020, and members will
        position that in order to provide telehealth services to a patient located in Florida, the   have another opportunity to address the state of telehealth in Florida.
        rendering physician must be licensed in this state. Clearly, that is no longer the case.
          The Telehealth Act also addresses several issues that have arisen as this method of   Stephen Siegel, Partner in the Coral Gables office of Lubell/Rosen, can be reached at
        delivering health care services has evolved:                                                                    (305) 298-8640 or shs@lubellrosen.com.
          - Standard of Practice. A telehealth provider is expected to practice “in a manner






         8                         June 2019                                                                southfloridahospitalnews.com                                                                       South Florida Hospital News
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13