Page 215 - DNBI_A01.QXD
P. 215

192

DEVELOPING NEW BUSINESS IDEAS                                   Level of personal
                                                                  financial risk

                                               Low High

                                         Low Risk avoiding                       Risk accepting
                                                         Activity seeking        Activity seeking

                               Level of
                                profit
                               motive

                                         High  Risk avoiding                     Risk accepting
                                               Profit seeking                    Profit seeking

                               Figure 5.6 Identifying your risk comfort zone144

not every entrepreneur shares the same
attitude to risk and return

             In the case of Federal Express founder Frederick Smith, his active
             service during the Vietnam War contributed significantly to shaping his
             attitude to perceiving and accepting risk: ‘I think probably my
             experience in the service [made me realize that] the currency of
             exchange in FedEx was just money, it wasn’t people’s arms and legs or
             lives . . . I was willing to take a chance, because losing wasn’t the worst
             thing in the world that could happen to you.’145

             What you need to do is to establish where within the grid your personal
             preferences place you. You then need to consider the extent to which
             the individual business ideas with their varying levels of risk match
             your risk comfort zone. If an idea does not match, you should consider
             either rejecting the idea or reconfiguring it so that it does match. Where
             an idea does match, you can evaluate the degree of the match as either
             strong, medium or weak, and carry the score forward into later stages of
             the evaluation.
   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220