Page 7 - English Time

Safi tri Yosita R.: Students Factors Infl uencing…(page 24-32)

Table 3
Final Estimation of Fixed Effects (with Robust Standard Errors) HOME 2011

Fixed Effect Coefficient Standard t- Approx. p-
Error ratio d.f. value
For INTRCPT1, β 0
INTRCPT2, γ 426.53 3.60 119.32 149 <0.001
00
For HOME slope, β
INTRCPT2, γ 1 -5.28 1.21 -4.37 4021 <0.001
10

the model was accounted for by the student- noted in the output, the analysis consulted

level variables (HOME) and 61% was the significance value for the THINK, γ10in

accounted for by the school-level variables. the final estimation output table (refer to
This estimation implies that in Indonesia, Table 4). It gives a meaning that there was
most of the variation in reading literacy was a relationship between THINK variable and
not due to differences between students, but PVTOT variable.

due to differences between schools. Thus, Moreover, there was a significant
this finding indicated that in 2011, between relationship between group variance (r=

schools may have potential to decrease -8.13, p<0.001). The negative values implied
home parent involvement activity in helping that THINK variable had not performed
students’ homework. excellent to the performance of reading

Second, analysis was estimated with literacy. It meant that higher level of student
PVTOT as the outcome and THINK as the perception regarding reading will decrease
mean of dependant variable. The PVTOT students’ performance on reading literacy.
intercepts-as-outcomes model was similar Therefore, it may be suggested that student

to the random coefficient used for the other perception will be valuable when it was
conditions except that it included other supported by reading aspect such as reading
variables as a predictor of the intercept. attitudes and behaviours as mentioned in the

Thus, the equation was somewhat similar to coefficient reading aspect output. In addition,
the previous pattern in HOME, except for the an implication can be made that most of the
THINK was the variable to be replaced. As variation in reading literacy in Indonesia was

Table 4
Final Estimation of Fixed Effects (with Robust Standard Errors) THINK 2011

Fixed Effect Coefficient Standard t- Approx. p-
Error ratio d.f. value
For INTRCPT1, β 0
INTRCPT2, γ 429.46 3.64 118.07 149 <0.001
00
For HOME slope, β
INTRCPT2, γ 1 -8.13 1.73 -4.69 4021 <0.001
10

29