Page 147 - Constructing Craft
P. 147

were changing. The term ‘design’ and its associations with contemporary objects

               increasingly became part of the discourse of craft art.


               Teaching methods also appeared to be out of touch with the more qualification-
               orientated approach to education. The craft model of learning based on technical

               education ‒ learning through practice ‒ had been the preferred method of
               instruction in most craft courses being taught by polytechnics up until the mid-

               1970s. Some educators in New Zealand – as in Britain – believed that the method

                                                             9
               was a closed system that stifled innovation.  They suggested a model that would
               draw craft closer to the methods used in art schools and would be more appropriate

               in the new environment. The Labour government decided to construct a new

               qualifications framework that would align polytechnic and university qualifications.
               From the early 1990s ‘all tertiary qualifications were progressively replaced by
                                                                       10
               national certificates, national diplomas and degrees.’  Craft education was
               included.




               Craft in Academia



               Craft education as an officially accredited subject dominated the thinking of both
               educators and craftspeople and the CCNZ sought to establish itself as the

               legitimating authority. In 1988 the CCNZ devoted an issue of its magazine to it. Ray

               Thorburn, the Education Officer and national spokesperson for art, craft and design
               education at the tertiary level for the Department of Education, acknowledged

               Beeby’s contribution to art and craft education, but condemned the legacy that
               lingered.


                        The  real  journey  began  in  the  1950s  under  the  inspired
                        leadership  of  Dr  Clarence  Beeby,  Director  General  [sic]  of
                        Education.  However,  ever  since  then  a  naïve  belief  has
                        lingered, ie that art and craft education was all joyful discovery.
                        Fun to do but not a serious classroom pursuit. Creative talent it
                        would  seem  was  a  mystical  power  source  deep  inside  us  all,
                        patiently waiting to bloom into innocent imagery, untutored and
                        untarnished  by  adult  intervention.  …  The  “art  is  fun  but  not
                        work”  [s]yndrome  [sic]  is  still  widespread.  …  The  fact  that
                        craftspeople  are  making  an  important  contribution  to  New

                                                                          Constructing Craft
   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152