Page 152 - Constructing Craft
P. 152

While not specifically critical of the developments in education, the writer was

               attempting to articulate ‒ albeit using twisted tautology ‒ the divergence between
               untrained practising craftspeople – the old/traditional/economic professional ‒ and

               those who defined professionalism in terms of formal academic qualifications.


               The letter from A. Craftsperson reflected concerns and prejudices held by many
               craftspeople who considered themselves professional through their ability to earn

               their living from their craft. In a 1983 study of the New Zealand craft industry the

               authors reported that the main criticism directed at the two existing full-time craft
               courses – ceramics at Otago Polytechnic and weaving at Nelson Polytechnic – was

               ‘not at the technical standards of the courses but at their ability to produce
                                                              23
               graduates suited to work in “the real world.”’  The attendees at the meetings called
               to gather opinion asked on a number of occasions ‘how many … course graduates

               were actually making a living from their craft. They could see little evidence that the
                                                                                                24
               courses were setting people on the road to successful vocational craftwork.’
               Although the authors of the report questioned the justification for such opinions they
               did note that such attitudes towards formal craft courses were quite common. An

               anti-academic bias pervaded the craft world.


               Not all opinion was unsympathetic and many craftspeople thought that formal

               courses would be beneficial in areas such as design, but these views were often
               limited to those living in the main centres.  The overall feeling was that

               professionalism in the crafts was related to the ability to earn a living and while
               there was support for some formal education there was not universal support for

               full-time, formal training of an academic kind.


               Those advocating a more academically oriented education programme expected

               government support would flow in the form of grants to individual craftspeople as

               had happened overseas. This disturbed some craftspeople who believed that
               earning a living in any other way than directly through the sale of craft was

               somehow less uplifting and possibly even subversive. In 1982 Roger Brittain, a
               potter, said that the ‘most gifted craftspeople’ should be able to work ‘full-time in

                           25
               their craft.’  He cautioned that economic independence was an important element
               of professionalism.

                                                                          Constructing Craft
   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157