Page 153 - Constructing Craft
P. 153

It is important for their own self-esteem that the craftsperson is
                        not  treated  as  a  charity  or  as  a  poor  relation  either  by  the
                        community at large or by those who are craft administrators. …
                        I find difficulty in recognising the benefit of so-called assistance
                        to  the  whole  crafts  movement,  for  example  the  “no  strings
                        attached” grants to individuals. … Let’s dispel the idea which is
                        about,  that  some  of  us  are  surviving  on  handouts  of  the
                                           26
                        taxpayer’s money.

               In the first half of the 1980s two reports, one on full-time weavers and one that

               included potters, were released by the Department of Internal Affairs. They showed

               that attitudes to income and professional status remained problematic. The 1984
               report on weavers attempted to circumvent the amateur versus professional

               distinction by stating that: ‘While there are many “professional” weavers in terms of
               attitudes to their craft and standard of workmanship there are few weavers who can

                                                                                       27
               sustain themselves economically as professional full-time weavers.’  Given that the
               title of the report included the words ‘full-time weavers’ the comment was revealing.
               If most full-time weavers could not earn a livelihood from their craft then was the

               term ‘professional’ being subverted? An earlier report included potters and divided
               them between those who generated less than 50% of their income from pottery and

               those who earned more than 50%, suggesting that above this mark was the domain
                                                                                               28
               of professionals regardless of whether it represented a viable living income.  By
               the time the certificate and diploma craft courses were operating in 1986 the model

               employed leaned more towards the academic learning environment suggesting that
               the middle-class priorities in education – recognised qualifications – had become

               the way to define professionalism.




               Professionalism in the Marketplace


               Economic viability was important to craftspeople but, over time, the crafts being

               produced and the market they were selling in changed. Many craftspeople who
               earned part or all of their income from the work they sold through craft shops and

               fairs were unconcerned about how they were perceived within the art world, but

               some, particularly those graduating from the new craft courses, were anxious about
               their cultural position as well as their future economic viability ‒ as we will see below



                                                                          Constructing Craft
   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158