Page 143 - Constructing Craft
P. 143

Chapter Seven: Craft Education




               The philosophical debate about learning that took place in Britain after the Second

               World War through to the 1970s played a part in the way that craft professionals

               defined themselves in the 1980s and early 1990s in New Zealand. The dividing
               issue was the workshop method of passing on skills versus the art school teaching

               of design.  ‘Design’, to some extent, became the catchword that distinguished
               between new and old pedagogical methods and between ‘new’ and ‘old’ craft.

               ‘Design’ was linked with industrial production ‒ with ‘brands, promotion, and
                                                     1
               identity’, but also with the art world.  New Zealand craftspeople rarely had any
               training in industrial design and many had only a limited amount of craft education.

               Therefore, the linking of design and training was viewed with suspicion.


               From the mid-1960s, the preferred learning environment in New Zealand for
               professional craftspeople lacked any formal structure at all. In most cases future

               craftspeople joined a club or attended a night class. When they gained some

               rudimentary skills a fortunate few gained employment in a small studio workshop

               where learners worked with more experienced craftspeople     similar to the
               traditional British model. However, in New Zealand, most craftspeople taught
               themselves in home workshops. All these locations carried associations with ‘blue-

               collar’ occupations or leisure – the trade workshop or hobbies. Not all British

               craftspeople however, supported this method. Norman Potter, a furniture maker,
               believed that craftspeople were in limbo between old craft methods and new design

               education so that ‘many small workshops [were] cut off from the intellectual currents
               of their time producing work that was self-contained, sentimental and backward-

                        2
               looking’.  His criticism suggested that craftspeople needed to be stimulated by a
               variety of influences.



               The new ‘design’ courses that developed in Britain held the promise of ‘white-collar’
                                   3
               professional status  ‒ although it was not clear where that would be recognised if
               they were introduced in the less structured New Zealand craft environment. In
               addition, in Britain, some of the courses did not appear to be preparing craftspeople

                                     4
               for self-employment,  and in New Zealand, where the opportunities for teaching
                                                                          Constructing Craft
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148