Page 23 - Constructing Craft
P. 23

nineteenth century when a perceptible decline in handcraft skills was becoming

               evident.


               The notion that life for craftspeople in earlier times was, if not idyllic, then at least
               tranquil, and that the objects of the past were better in quality, remained strong well

               into the twentieth century ‒ largely sustained by the writings of the founders of the
               Arts and Crafts movement. The myth of the happy artisan became part of a

               romantic reaction against the spread of industrial capitalism.


               The Arts and Crafts Movement

               The Arts and Crafts Movement helped the studio craft movement establish a

               philosophical base. As one writer observed, the movement was ‘more remarkable
                                                                             15
               for what it inspired than for what it actually accomplished’.  The founders of the
               movement wished to provide examples of everyday objects of beauty made by hand

               to demonstrate how the working environment could be made more dignified for
               working-class craftsmen. The movement linked the apparent deterioration in

               people’s lives with the loss of craft skills.  These ideas were founded on a romantic
               vision of work and life in pre-industrial Britain:

                        [It] was not an art movement in which artists sought to display
                        the  world  in  new  ways,  but  one  that  sought  fundamental
                        changes to the organisation of Victorian society.  The masses,
                        “the  people”,  must  be  rescued  from  sub-human  living  and
                        working  conditions  created  by  the  Industrial  Revolution.  The
                        movement developed a golden-tinged view of medieval life as
                        simple,  uncluttered  and  country-based,  with  the  economy
                        centred  on  the  household  as  the  dominant  production  unit.
                        Handcraft  was  heralded  as  the  ultimate  redemptive  mode  of
                        production  and  the  restoration  and  preservation  of  medieval
                                                                16
                        handicrafts became a national cause.


               The movement was predominantly British but was copied in New Zealand. John
               Ruskin was the movement’s philosopher and visionary while William Morris picked

                                                                                                       17
               up and amplified Ruskin’s ideas and later adapted them to his own socialist ideals.
               Morris was a talented designer who believed that hand-made crafts could provide

               happiness for both the maker and the user.  In 1877 Morris maintained that the

               separation of the fine arts from the ‘decorative or lesser crafts’ had been a relatively
               recent event and that the decorative arts ‘properly reconstituted ... had a noble



                                                                          Constructing Craft
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28