Page 278 - Constructing Craft
P. 278

with a New Zealand branch, indicated that some craftspeople were considering

               aspects of craft that went beyond the purely technical and social.


               By 1978 the NZWCC was positioning itself as the principal national craft
               organisation. It became an incorporated society and was renamed the CCNZ. Initially

               the CCNZ’s primary function was to act for the WCC, but it soon became clear that it
               needed to establish a position in New Zealand that would distinguish it from the

               major craft-specific organisations. In attempting to do this it created friction within the

               studio craft movement. This friction largely centred on the issues of standards and
               management which would trouble the movement for the next fifteen years. An

               example of this early disharmony is evident in the letter Dorothea Turner, the

               founding President of the New Zealand Spinning, Weaving and Woolcrafts Society
               (NZSWWS) and a foundation member of the NZWCC executive committee, wrote to

               the CCNZ in 1978 resigning her individual membership. Her action appears to have
               been sparked by a decision the CCNZ made to assist the artist Guy Ngan coordinate

               an exhibition of mixed craft planned for the Christchurch Arts Festival in November
               1978. In her letter Turner suggests that the standards set by the NZSWWS were

               being questioned by the CCNZ – perhaps as a result of the decisions Ngan had
                                                                        6
               made about what would be included in the exhibition.  Turner, representing the
               traditional approach to her craft, was questioning the incursion of the art world into

               the world of craft. It was an example of the types of arguments and disagreements
               that would threaten the unity of the CCNZ in the late 1980 and early 1990s.




               Membership Difficulties

               The CCNZ needed paying members to partly fund its operation, but more

               importantly, it needed members to give validity to its claim to be the representative
               body of craftspeople in New Zealand and the ultimate authority on quality. This

               resulted in a series of compromises that created an executive structure that was

               unwieldy. During its formative period, in the late-1970s, the bulk of the CCNZ’s
               funding came from Lottery Board grants, therefore the need to establish an

               authoritative ‘voice’ held a higher priority than recruiting paying members.





                                                                          Constructing Craft
   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283