Page 5 - Data Managment __ Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme(IDSP)
P. 5

10/1/2020                           Data Managment :: Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme(IDSP)
          outbreak.  Data  analysis  and  actions  are  being  undertaken  by  respective
          State/District Surveillance Units. Emphasis is now being laid on reporting of
          surveillance  data  from  Major  Hospitals  and  also  from  Infectious  Disease
          Hospitals.


          Evolution of Data Reporting Formats

          It was repeatedly felt that the forms used by IDSP (before 2007) to collect
          data need simplification. A stakeholder meeting was held in August 2007 and
          some modifications were suggested in the IDSP formats. These modifications
          were  also  discussed  with  CDC  Team  which  reviewed  IDSP  during  10-17
          September  2007.  A  meeting  was  held  in  April  2008  to  finalize  the
          simplification of formats of IDSP.

          Experts from different organizations attended the meeting and discussed in
          detail the modifications suggested by experts in earlier meetings. Amongst
          many changes suggested, it was decided that in ‘S’ form, the age and gender
          specific  data  for  cases  will  not  be  collected  to  improve  reporting  and
          minimize  errors.  Further,  in  continuation,  a  meeting  was  held  under  the
          Chairmanship of Additional Secretary & MD (NRHM) on 19th December 2008
          to  examine  IDSP  proposal  and  after  detailed  deliberations,  the  simplified
          formats were approved on 1st January 2009. In the meeting it was decided
          that ‘in the proposed ‘P’ and ‘L’ forms, the data element on deaths may be
          deleted as it is being captured in the new NRHM-HMIS formats’. Presently no
          mortality data is being collected in ‘P’ format under IDSP.

          Also by 2008-09, after the Joint Review Mission, it was agreed that following
          the  voluminous  syndromic  data  at  states  and  center  was  a  futile  exercise;
          instead  the  CSU  and  SSU  should  give  more  stress  on  analysis  of  data
          reported  in  “P”  and  “L”  formats.  Since  then  the  syndromic  data  is  being
          analysed at the district and sub-districts levels only as alerts for investigating
          the  increased  number  or  clustering  of  cases  of  any  syndrome  (e.g.  fevers,
          diarrheas, cough or jaundice or any other unusual syndromes).


          The list of conditions under surveillance was also revised giving more focus
          on  outbreak  prone  conditions  (Annexure  3,  appended  old  and  new  list  of
          conditions under surveillance).

          Current Status

          Currently about 97% Districts are reporting weekly disease surveillance data
          under IDSP. The revised P and L forms have been made available on IDSP
          portal  to  enable  on-line  data  entry.  The  data  entry  on  IDSP  portal  is
          consistently improving. A committee consisting of IDSP Epidemiologists and
          experts from NCDC monitor the status of receipt of weekly surveillance data;
          analyze  data  on  a  sample  basis,  and  share  the  analysis  with  state
          surveillance units to promote similar analysis at the state and district levels.
          Further, CSU is undertaking regular video conferencing to discuss reporting
          issues  and  seek  clarifications  on  discrepancies  in  data  such  as  sudden
          increase in the number of reported cases including actions taken.

          The year wise weekly reporting of S,P and L forms by all the districts through
          IDSP Protal is shown below.

      https://idsp.nic.in/index4.php?lang=1&level=0&linkid=412&lid=3695                                         2/3
   1   2   3   4   5   6