Page 79 - CITN 2017 Journal

Figure 2: Descriptive distribution for the variables of the study
The summary distribution for the predictor (corporate effectiveness) and the criterion
variable (performance measurement) is presented in figure 2 with the chart illustrating
substantial evidence of both variables within the investigated organizations (where
corporate effectiveness = 4.0417 and performance measurement = 4.1030).

Test of Hypotheses

Table 3: Result for hypotheses

Efficiency Asset Productivity Control

**
**
**
**
R .904 .892 .936 .924
Effective Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000
N 72 72 72 72
Source: Authors' Computation, 2016
The result for the tests on the hypotheses reveals that corporate effectiveness (Effective) is
significantly associated with the measures of performance measurement. The data
indicates that corporate effectiveness significantly impacts on efficiency (where R = .904
at P = 0.000); corporate effectiveness is significantly associated with Asset management
(where R = .892 at P = 0.000); corporate effectiveness is significantly associated with
productivity (where R = .936 at P = 0.000); corporate effectiveness is also significantly
associated with control and improvement (where R = .924 at P = 0.000).
Based on the empirical evidence presented, we reject all the four null hypotheses.

72