Page 8 - PARAMETER C

The same process shall also be sought for sponsor-driven program
proposals.

✓ Criteria in Evaluating R&D Proposals

Following are some considerations under each criterion to evaluate the
Projects proposals:

1. Tangible Impact on Improving Quality of Academic Programs.

The extent to which the proposal is expected to bring direct benefits
to the policy formulation aimed at improving quality of academic

program;

2. Multidisciplinary Approach. The involvement of proponents coming

from different disciplines is given preference in the evaluation of

proposals; The partnership of senior and Junior researchers
(mentor- mentee relationships) is also desirable.

3. Clarity and Manageability. The proposal should be clear, concise

and implementable within the period as proposed. Among the

desirable characters should be:

• Key activities of the project and time for each are clearly
outlined in the proposal.

• Attainable outcome results (long term) and output results

(short term or immediate)
• Realistic performance measurement indicators
• Small scale and short project cycle (able to demonstrate
results within shorter period)

4. Sustainability, Replication and Up-scaling. The extent to which

the expected results of the proposal have the potentials to be

replicated or up-scaled in larger scale, in another geographic region
or in other context.

5. Realistic and Relevant Budget. Among these should include:

• The extent to which the proposed budget is realistic.
• The extent to which the proposed budget items are relevant.