Page 24 - 100 Reflections that Crafted Geneva International_V-Petrovsky_private special edition
P. 24

100 Reflections that Crafted Geneva International

          European UN Office was more linked to the Headquarters in New York than
          with other international organizations in  Geneva. It did not have significant
          contact with academia or NGOs, or any at all with the business community.
              In a referendum launched by the Federal Government in 1986, the Swiss
          rejected accession to the UN. This was surprising, as the UN had just marked
          its 40 th  anniversary after significant successes including hosting the historic
          Reagan-Gorbachev a year earlier. The timing was so favourable that it was a
          huge disappointment that the 1986 referendum was rejected by an
          overwhelming majority of 75,7%; and Geneva, home of UNOG, was 69,6%
          against joining. What was the reason of such a result? Was it because of
          neutrality, so dear to every Swiss citizen? Perhaps, although the Geneva result
          implies a lack of connection to the Organization the city hosted.
              Fifteen years later, a new referendum was launched on popular initiative
          and was passed, albeit by a slim majority. While none of the Cantons in 1986
          voted in favour, this time, in 2002, 13 Cantons supported accession. And many
          of neighbouring Cantons and Geneva completely reversed their position, from
          69,6 per cent against to 66,7 per cent in favour. How did this become possible?
              Studying both referenda carefully and making a comparative analysis
          (detailed in Annex II) reveals a striking conclusion. For nine of those 15
          intervening years Mr Petrovsky crafted Geneva International, nurtured its ties
          and  worked  hard to unify the right  bank  of  Lac  Leman  with  the  left  bank.  He

          was recognised as a citizen “who made Geneva” – rare recognition (and

          at that  time  the first ever) for a UN staff member – by establishing close ties
          with Swiss authorities, giving lectures to students, and establishing trust
          between the UN and the Swiss people. He especially focused  on the latter,
          opening the doors of the Palais des Nations to everyone, explaining the
          advantages  of  membership  and  gaining  trust.  All  this  went  toward
          persuading  the  Swiss  that  being  part  of  the  UN  would  be  to  their  advantage
          and would not compromise their neutrality, so important and dear for them.
              All this contributed greatly to the miraculous 3 March 2002 referendum
                                      th
          vote, making Switzerland the 190  UN Member State. Naturally, Mr. Petrovsky
          worked alongside many other people to influence this result: politicians,
          diplomats and other authorities. However, his role, especially in Geneva, was
          pivotal, not only for Geneva International but particularly for the referendum.
              I was a first-hand witness, closely connected to Swiss people in different
          parts of the country, with part of the family in Bern and friends in Cantons
          Neuchâtel, Fribourg, Zürich and Basel. I was able to see how attitudes to the
          UN changed. By the mid-1990s people became less wary of UN membership,
          the attitude became much warmer, and I could see the Open Doors policy had
          a dramatic effect. It made people feel welcome, and they came not only from

                                          2
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29