Page 335 - 100 Reflections that Crafted Geneva International_V-Petrovsky_private special edition
P. 335

Bringing the Concept to Life

               word for word from the  French “Declaration des Droits  de l`Homme et du
               Citoyen”. So, this was revolutionary, but in 1789, not 1948.

                  One of the primary objectives of the United Nat ions is securing universal
               respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms for individuals throughout
               the world. In this  connection, few topics are of greater importance than the
               fight against impunity and the struggle for peace and justice and human rights
               in conflict situations in today's world.


                  On 17 July 1998 in Rome, 160 nations decided to establish a permanent
               international criminal court to try individuals for the most serious offences of
               global concern. such as genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.
               This was an historic occasion  because the  creation of such a court will only
               have come half a  decade after it was first  called for in the United Nations'
               founding Charter. The court's creation had been postponed until the Member
               States of the UN could agree on an appropriate definition of the term “aggres-

               sion.” The necessity for creating such a court now came front the realization
               that  the ad-hoc tribunals set up to try  suspected criminals following
               specific conflicts  were  too  limited in their jurisdiction  and not flexible
               enough to address larger, more complex circumstances surrounding these
               conflicts. But most important of all, the world did not have a permanent body
               to a deter new violations from occurring in the first place. For nearly fifty years,
               the Member States of the General Assembly discussed the need for such an
               international instrument to apply the much needed jurisdiction to such
               questions as genocide, crimes against humanity and crimes of war. This effort
               was mired in legalistic ambiguity and, ultimately, worries over issues of national
               sovereignty.  The  proposed  international  court  was  seen  by  many  States  as  a
               direct affront to their national legal jurisdictions and autonomy. However,
               modern  day   atrocities such as Bosnia and Rwanda, conflicts where
               unspeakable atrocities have been perpetrated, shook the international
               community into reexamining this  important  issue.  It  became  clear  that  such
               heinous  crimes  would  probably  go unpunished, leaving those most
               responsible free to continue to their inhumane abuses. In the words of the
               UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, “A person stands a better chance of being
               tried and judged for killing one human being than for killing 100,000.”


                  It the parliaments of at least 60 signatory countries ratify this agreement,
               the International Criminal Court will begin its work and will, at last, provide the
               world with a mechanism for eliminating impunity for crimes against humanity.
               The International Criminal Court was one of the missing links in an effective

                                              313
   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340