Page 16 - Review Jurnal (Ayu Repi)

Table 2. Descriptive Statistics with respect to IGO, EGO, TV, CLB, SELP and TA across the Groups
N Pretest Posttest Gain Skewness Kurtosis Standard
(Posttest-pretest) Deviation

CG EG CG EG CG EG CG EG CG EG CG EG CG EG

GainIGO 20 25 17.40 19.08 18.00 21.72 0.600 2.636 0.179 0.072 0.767 -0.483 4.109 3.925

GainEGO 20 25 20.47 20.04 18.35 21.28 -2.125 1.240 -0.081 1.811 -1.370 5.382 4.103 5.666

GainTV 20 25 29.25 29.66 26.35 33.00 -2.900 3.336 -0.380 0.101 1.214 3.073 9.706 3.702
GainCLB 20 25 21.32 21.54 20.35 24.04 -0.975 2.500 -0.042 0.701 -0.188 1.665 3.514 4.062

GainSELP 20 25 40.15 36.83 36.30 43.64 -3.850 6.808 0.220 0.434 -1.557 -0.149 7.693 7.239
GainTA 20 25 17.60 18.46 21.25 20.84 3.650 2.380 1.319 0.188 1.941 -0.255 4.373 7.726

Table 3. MANOVA Results with respect to Dependent Variables of IGO, EGO, TV, CLB, SELP, TA
Source Pillai's trace F Hypothesis Error Significance Eta Power
Df Df (p) Squared
2
µ )
Treatment 0.377 3.839 6.000 38 0.004 0.377 0.935

Table 4. Follow-up Univariate ANOVAS
Source Dependent Df F Sig.(p) Eta-Squared Observed
Variable Power
Treatment IGO 1 2.867 0.098 0.063 0.381
EGO 1 4.961 0.031 0.103 0.586
TV 1 8.768 0.005 0.169 0.825
CLB 1 9.149 0.004 0.175 0.840
SELP 1 22.782 0.000 0.346 0.997
TA 1 0.429 0.516 0.010 0.098

110