Page 17 - Green Builder Sept-Oct 2020 Issue
P. 17

All-electric homes by census region
                   BY ALAN NADITZ
                              NCE UPON A TIME, Charles Arias thought all the                 (2005, 2009, 2015)
                              talk about an emerging electric housing market           Share of all primary residences
                              was just that—talk. He says he couldn’t envision a
                              time when people would willingly give up all-too-  50%
                  O convenient natural gas water heaters or stoves in
                   favor of electric-powered models that, in his opinion, simply didn’t   45%  2015
                   perform as well.                                             2005  2009
                     Fast-forward ƒve years. He now lives in a Sacramento-area all-
                   electric community and has no complaints. “I admit I was wrong,   40%
                   or at least not well informed about electricity versus gas,” he says.
                   “They are, in most instances, on equal par. My utility bill is even a   35%
                   few dollars less each month, which is pretty good, considering this
                   house is about ˆ,‰‰‰ square feet bigger than my old one.”  30%                          million homes (2015)
                     Expect that pro-electricity scenario to play out more over the next
                   decade, as people become better aware of the beneƒts of electric                          South      19.7
                   power, according to a report by Boulder, Colorado-based marketing   25%
                   intelligence ƒrm Guidehouse Insights (formerly Navigant Research).                         West   4.6
                     Report co-authors Daniel Talero and Neil Strother say electriƒcation   20%
                   technologies are “rapidly becoming more cost e”ective and more                          Midwest   3.8
                   reliable than fossil fuel systems in a variety of planning scenarios   15%
                   and climatic conditions…although mixed systems predominate, the                        Northeast  1.6
                   electriƒcation of all residential energy end uses is desirable for many   10%
                   consumers, and is expected to increase substantially on a ˆ‰-year                               0  10  20
                   timeline.”
                     The study projects more than a –‰‰ percent increase in revenue—  5%              First quarter action. Twenty-five
                   from $˜.™ billion in ˜‰˜‰ to $ˆ˜.š billion in ˜‰˜š—for fully electriƒed            percent of homes nationwide now
                   home technologies. The report deƒnes a “fully electric home” (FEH)   0%            use only electricity, with the share of
                                                                                                      all-electric homes rising in each
                   as one where space heating, water heating and cooking are electriƒed               census region over the past decade,
                   through the use of air source heat pumps (ASHPs), heat pump water   SOURCE: U.S. ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION  particularly in the Midwest and South.
                   heaters (HPWHs), and induction cooking technologies. Insulation
                   and energy management systems (EMS) are not part of the deƒnition,
                   but many FEHs have them, the reports adds.                That may not be so easy. Natural gas remains the least expensive
                     Pushing that growth will be high demand for cost-effective   fossil fuel-based energy source and is the preferred heating tool for ™¥
                   technology such as insulation and heat pump water heaters, rapidly   percent of all U.S. households, according to DOE. There is also a much
                   improving cost and performance metrics across climate zones and   larger number of older, gas-dependent homes—about –‰ million
                   markets, and high job creation associated with building retroƒtting,   nationwide to nearly ¦– million electric-only—and owners are more
                   the study notes.                                        likely to stick with what’s been working for them, the agency notes.
                                                                             It’s primarily a case of money, according to the Rocky Mountain
                   THE BURNING QUESTION                                    Institute (RMI), which in ˜‰ˆ¥ released a study on the economics
                   There’s also a reality clause: Approximately Ÿ‰ million American   of electrifying home buildings. In general, the study found that the
                   homes burn natural gas, oil or propane onsite to heat interior space   older the home, the more likely it is to function on, and continue to
                   and water. This generates –¡‰ million tons of CO  each year—one-  use, gas-powered appliances. “In many scenarios, notably for most
                                                          ˜
                   tenth of total U.S. emissions, and just under half of all residential   new home construction, we ƒnd electriƒcation reduces costs over
                   end-use energy consumption nationally, according to the U.S.   the lifetime of the appliances when compared with fossil fuels,” the
                   Environmental Protection Agency. “If you think about that, it makes   study notes. “However, for the many existing homes currently heated
                   electricity a more-attractive path,” Arias says. “As long as you know   with natural gas, electriƒcation will increase costs at today’s prices,
                   what you want and what’s out there, there appears to be no reason   compared to replacing gas furnaces and water heaters with new
                   not to at least think about making the conversion, or ¢at-out buying   gas devices.”
                   a house that already says goodbye to [natural] gas.”      A  ˜‰ˆ¥  study  from  the§ California  Building  Industry
                                                                           Association§(CBIA) found that homes with natural gas appliances
                                                                           could cost up to $Ÿ,˜‰‰ to upgrade wiring and electrical panels for
                   Watt house. Stanford University Professor Marc Jacobson went all   the purchase of new electric appliances, average $¥ŸŸ per household
                   electric with his custom-made home in a successful effort to prove how   each year in increased energy costs, and result in an overall cost
                   easy it is to transition off fossil fuels.
                                                                           increase of $™.¦ billion to $¡.ˆ billion per year.
                   CREDIT: BONE STRUCTURE AND MARC JACOBSON
                   www.greenbuildermedia.com                                               September/October 2020 GREEN BUILDER  15




          12-25 GB 0920 All Electric.indd   15                                                                                  10/5/20   3:56 PM
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22