Page 113 - A Handbook for Academia, Industry and Policymakers: Reinforcing the Innovation-Employability Nexus in the Mediterranean
P. 113

112  REINFORCING THE INNOVATION-EMPLOYABILITY NEXUS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN  REINFORCING THE INNOVATION-EMPLOYABILITY NEXUS IN THE MEDITERRANEAN  113


 Policies promoting science-industry collaboration  of innovation programmes which are co-funded   Conclusion
            by European Regional Development Funds,
            including a start-up support, an industrial PhD   Like research excellence initiatives, public-private
 Governments play a key role as facilitators for   private and public research competences at a   programme, seed funding for knowledge industry
 collaboration and innovation processes at all   single location; (b) it has a medium- to long-term   projects, support for networks and clusters, and   partnerships should be supported by significant
 levels. Policies promoting science-industry co-  perspective; and (c) it builds on a reliable public-  certification for tech transfer centres, to name   funding  over  a long  period  of time,  providing
 creation focus on fostering more intense modes of   private partnership. Following the selection made   just a few. These instruments are developed and   that their ambition is to deliver innovation that
 research collaboration through creating enabling   in 2012, a total of nine research campuses are   administered through the Catalan agency for   addresses important societal challenges.  The
 framework conditions for both academia and   currently funded, for a period of up to 15 years   business competitiveness, ACCIO.  success of these initiatives depends to a large
 industry. These include initiatives such as long-  (until 2027), with the possibility of extending   extent on the capacity of university and research
 term funding, tax incentives and shared facilities.   it  further through a  follow-up programme.   centres to work with industry, creating a mutual
 The collaborative research projects might also   The research campuses represent a new type   benefit. Existing collaborative experiences and
 involve public institutions and civil society   of research structure in the German system,   FROM AD HOC TO  trust between the partners are key success
 organisations.   where researchers from universities, research   factors for a fruitful, long-term relationship and
                                                                                102
 institutes and companies work ‘under one roof’.   STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS  positive outcomes . Ultimately, the success
 A well-established approach to promoting   While several companies – including SMEs –   of these programmes depends on the parties’
 science-industry collaboration has been to   must participate in a research campus, large   University collaborations are first and   ability to develop a mutual benefit and a good
 provide financial grants to research projects,   multinational companies are the main driving   foremost  established  by  individual  understanding, to enable the centres’ continuity
 conditional on the establishment of consortia   force.  The  research  campuses  operate under   researchers or company staff and focus on   after the public funding phase expires. Over the
 between academia and industry.  Through   various forms of organisation and contracts,   specific needs identified by those individuals.   course of the programme, the research centres
 the EU neighbours programme, the MedUP!   depending on their specific needs.  This means that collaboration partners are   develop new research methods, skills, and
 Project is one such collaboration, promoting   likely chosen based on personal networks   competences, as well as obtain new equipment
 an enabling environment in the Southern   The Swedish Strategic Innovation Programmes   in that the rationale for partner selection   and infrastructure, which are highly valued by the
 Mediterranean partner countries (Egypt, Jordan,   (SIP) initiative (https://www.vinnova.se/en/m/  is  familiarity  between  individuals  rather   industrial partners.
 Lebanon, Morocco, Palestine and  Tunisia) for   strategic-innovation-programmes/) is based on   than a good fit between the two (or more)
 the  development of  the social entrepreneurship   a different approach. It features larger consortia   organisations. Although this may lead to
 sector as a driver for inclusive growth and job   of various actors (universities, companies, civil   positive outcomes, from the perspective of
 creation. Over the years, these collaborative   society organisations and government agencies),   the organisation, the university collaboration
 grants have been implemented quite broadly, and   and a more explicit focus on finding sustainable   is limited to the specific project (typically
 now rank among the most relevant innovation   solutions for national and global challenges. The   within a business unit). From the university
 policy instruments across OECD countries in   first step of the programme consisted of a bottom-  or research centre perspective, individual   INSTITUTIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY
               researchers and their students gain a source
 terms of relative budget .  up process, where key actors of the innovation   of funding, insight into relevant problems,
 101
 system worked together to formulate ‘strategic   and opportunities to access novel assets or   While the aspirations of university-industry partnerships
 Beyond collaborative research grants, policies   research agendas’ (SIAs) through widespread   partners. Although these might lead to many   can be easily described, it is often challenging to establish
                                                                and run these partnerships effectively, even when the
 can also support longer-term co-creation   consultative processes involving large numbers   collaborations, there are few synergies.   resources  are  available.  The  challenge  is  amplified  in  an
 relationships by developing joint laboratories   of relevant actors. The second stage consisted of   Opportunities for broader engagement and   ecosystem where the various stakeholders operate with
 between academia and industry. Such private-  inviting proposals for SIPs within the areas defined   impact are lost. Large corporations and   their own ambitions and logics. These need to be properly
 public partnerships targeting the joint generation   by those SIAs. Sixteen SIPs have been selected   leading academic institutions are moving   aligned to achieve impact and avoid frustration that derive
 of knowledge are increasingly supported by   to date. Once initiated, the SIPs are responsible   towards more strategic partnerships in   from marked differences in culture and governance .
                                                                                                         103
 policymakers 101,102  and have also become more   for launching calls for project proposals (one or   which relationships are no longer simply   Whereas academic culture is characterised by a high degree
 attractive to firms adopting open innovation   two calls every year for each SIP) and overseeing   based on personal connections. In fact,   of distributed autonomy and governance, corporate culture
                                                                tends to emphasise central decision making and strategic
 strategies 103,104 .  They are often referred to as   the implementation of the resulting projects. The   companies have started to use company-  alignment . But even if the cultural divide between academia
                                                                       105
 ‘collaborative research centres’. Given their   programmes also conduct a small number of   wide master research agreements to create   and industry runs deep, it can be overcome through strong
 strategic,  long-term,  open-ended  scope,  they   ‘strategic projects’, which are usually larger and   transparency in their collaboration activities,   leadership, incentives, structures, and boundary spanners
 are closely related to the notion of ‘centres of   organised through a more direct process, without   improve  their  negotiating  positions,  that can operate in both ‘worlds’ (institutional ambidexterity),
 excellence’. Even if the boundaries are blurred,   issuing an open call. SIPs organise regular (e.g.   accelerate the deployment of projects, and   focusing on the possible benefits of operating across
                                                                                         106
 the distinctive feature of co-creation (compared to   annual) consultations with their members and   encourage interfaculty collaboration on   coexisting and contradictory logics .
 excellence initiatives) is the partnership formed   stakeholders in order to continuously assess   topics of shared interest .
                                      103
 between academia and industry to fund, manage   needs and priorities, as well as industry fairs and
 and implement the centre’s research activities.   workshops on specific topics of interest to the
 community.
 A good example of this is the German Research
 Campus  initiative  (www.forschungscampus.  Another good example is in Barcelona, where the
 bmbf.de) which meets three criteria: (a) it merges   regional government has developed a wide array
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118