Page 377 - A Helping Hand for Refugees

um he used was unrealistic. (Stanley Miller,
Molecular Evolution of Life: Current Status of the
Prebiotic Synthesis of Small Molecules, 1986, p. 7)
All the evolutionists' efforts throughout
the twentieth century to explain the origin of
life ended in failure. The geochemist Jeffrey
Bada, from the San Diego Scripps Institute
accepts this fact in an article published in
Earth magazine in 1998:
Today as we leave the twentieth century, we still
face the biggest unsolved problem that we had
As accepted also by the latest when we entered the twentieth century: How did
evolutionist theorists, the origin
of life is still a great stumbling life originate on Earth? (Jeffrey Bada, Earth,
block for the theory of evolution. February 1998, p. 40)

T The complex structure of life

The primary reason why evolutionists ended up in such a great
impasse regarding the origin of life is that even those living organisms
Darwinists deemed to be the simplest have outstandingly complex fea-
tures. The cell of a living thing is more complex than all of our man-
made technological products. Today, even in the most developed lab-
oratories of the world, no single protein of the cell, let alone a living
cell itself, can be produced by bringing organic chemicals together.
The conditions required for the formation of a cell are too great in
quantity to be explained away by coincidences. However, there is no
need to explain the situation with these details. Evolutionists are at a
dead-end even before reaching the stage of the cell. That is because the
probability of just a single protein, an essential building block of the
cell, coming into being by chance is mathematically "0."
The main reason for this is the need for other proteins to be pre-
sent if one protein is to form, and this completely eradicates the pos-
sibility of chance formation. This fact by itself is sufficient to elimi-
nate the evolutionist claim of chance right from the outset. To sum-
marize,

Adnan Oktar (Harun Yahya) 375