Page 768 - Atlas of Creation Volume 4

Darwinists ignore this miraculous system present in DNA and avoid going deeply into the subject

and coming up with any explanation of it; yet they construct a scenario of the history of life built on
replication errors with an almost zero possibility of happening. This once again reveals the nonsensical
nature of Darwinist logic.

Following the realization that Darwin’s idea of natural selection most definitely did not constitute
an account of evolution and the emergence of the laws of genetics becoming a lethal blow to Darwinism,
the claim of the “evolutionary effect of mutations,” which had been the main weapon of neo-Darwinism,
was seen to be no more than a deception. It is absolutely ridiculous to claim that a mechanism such as a
mutation, which damages, destroys and kills the living organism, as well as sometimes harming all sub-

sequent generations, can give rise to entirely new living things. But masses of people were taken in by
this lie for years. Darwinist scientists of course know that mutations have no such miraculous power.
Even Richard Dawkins, one of the present day’s most fervid Darwinists, admits that “most mutations are

deleterious, so some undesirable side effect is pretty likely.” 20 The reason why Darwinists still propose this
discredited claim as a mechanism for evolution is their devotion to the superstitious religion of
Darwinism.

4. The “discovery of the transitional form” is a fraud

The absence of transitional fossils did not look like an insuperable one in Darwin’s time. Darwin was
amazed that not a single intermediate fossil to confirm his theory had been discovered in any of the Earth’s

strata, but he still believed they would be “found in the future.” In the chapter titled “Difficulties on Theory”
of his The Origin of Species he wrote:

... Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere
see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion instead of the species be-
ing, as we see them, well defined?… But, as by this theory innumerable transitional forms

must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the
crust of the earth?.. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum
full of such intermediate links? 21

The lack of transitional fossils, which refuted Darwin’s expecta-
tions, and not a single one of which has been discovered over the

last 150 years, has demolished his theory. More than 350
million fossils have to date been unearthed.
These fossils have definitively declared the
crushing defeat of Darwinism. They all be-
long to complete and perfect life forms. A

great many are specimens of life forms still
living today. But not one of these 350 million is
An original copy of Darwin's
Origin of Species a transitional form.
The lack of transitional fossils means the
death of Darwinism, and is something that
the adherents of the superstitious faith that is
Darwinism cannot accept. For that reason,
Darwinists resorted to traditional methods

and began manufacturing fictitious transi-
tional fossils. Today, when we look at pub-
lications that are Darwinist in origin we see

that all the fossils depicted as transitional
forms are in fact the product of fraud. This

766 Atlas of Creation Vol. 4