Page 769 - Atlas of Creation Volume 4
P. 769
Harun Yahya
false evidence, which may sometimes be based on extinct life forms, sometimes on fictitious illustra-
tions, sometimes on just one single fossil tooth and sometimes on skulls fraudulently manufactured in
a laboratory environment, is all important proof that transitional fossils do not exist and that Darwinism
is a deception.
Professor of mathematics Wolfgang Smith is one of those scientists who openly admits that transitional fossils do not exist:
On the fundamental level, it becomes a rigorously demonstrable fact that there are no transitional types, and
the so-called missing links are indeed non-existent. 22
The evolutionist paleontologist Stephen Stanley makes this comment on the absence of transitional
fossils:
The known fossil record fails to document a single example of phyletic evolution accomplishing a major mor-
phology transition, and hence offers no evidence that gradualistic model can be valid. 23
The University of Kansas geologist Ronald R. West comments:
If evolution were true, the fossil record should have demonstrated:
1. The oldest rocks that bear evidence of life would contain the most primitive forms of life capable of fos-
silization.
2. Younger rocks would contain evidence of more complex forms of life.
3. There would be a gradual change in life forms from simple to complex.
4. There would be huge numbers of transitional forms.
However, contrary to what most scientists write, the fossil record does not support the Darwinian theory of
evolution. 24
Darwinists have been unable to put forth a single genuine intermediate form. Not a single transi-
tional fossil has ever been unearthed. There is not a single example of a genuine transitional form on dis-
play in museums of evolution. Each one of the 350 million fossils has refuted evolution. They are all ful-
ly formed and perfect fossils of life forms, whether still living or extinct.
The lack of transitional forms is such that even Darwinists cannot deny the obvious. Faced by vari-
ous difficulties, they sometimes are forced to admit it. One such statement comes from the evolutionist
paleontologist Colin Patterson:
I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions
in my book [Evolution]. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would have certainly have includ-
ed them. . . . I will lay it on the line – there is not one single transitional form in the fossil
record for which one could make a watertight argument. 25
There are more than 380 fossil beds on Earth. More
than 350 million fossils have to date been extracted
from those fossil beds. But all these fossils prove
Creation. Not a single one of these fossils is a
transitional form.
All fossils prove Creation...
Adnan Oktar 767

