Page 121 - Darwinism Refuted
P. 121

Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar)


             during the same geological period. Establishing an evolutionary
             relationship among them is impossible even by the broadest stretch of the
             imagination. The evolutionist zoologist R. Eric Lombard makes this point
             in an article that appeared in the leading journal Evolution:
                 Those searching for specific information useful in constructing phylogenies
                 of mammalian taxa will be disappointed. 150
                 In short, the origin of mammals, like that of other groups, fails to
             conform to the theory of evolution in any way. George Gaylord Simpson
             admitted that fact many years ago:

                 This is true of all thirty-two orders of mammals ... The earliest and most
                 primitive known members of every order [of mammals] already have the
                 basic ordinal characters, and in no case is an approximately continuous
                 sequence from one order to another known. In most cases the break is so
                 sharp and the gap so large that the origin of the order is speculative and
                 much disputed ... This regular absence of transitional forms is not confined
                 to mammals, but is an almost universal phenomenon, as has long been noted
                 by paleontologists. It is true of almost all classes of animals, both vertebrate
                 and invertebrate...it is true of the classes, and of the major animal phyla, and
                 it is apparently also true of analogous categories of plants. 151



                 The Myth of Horse Evolution
                 One important subject in the origin of mammals is the myth of the
             "evolution of the horse," also a topic to which evolutionist publications
             have devoted a considerable amount of space for a long time. This is a
             myth, because it is based on imagination rather than scientific findings.
                 Until recently, an imaginary sequence supposedly showing the
             evolution of the horse was advanced as the principal fossil evidence for
             the theory of evolution. Today, however, many evolutionists themselves
             frankly admit that the scenario of horse evolution is bankrupt. In 1980, a
             four-day symposium was held at the Field Museum of Natural History in
             Chicago, with 150 evolutionists in attendance, to discuss the problems
             with the gradualistic evolutionary theory. In addressing this meeting,
             evolutionist Boyce Rensberger noted that the scenario of the evolution of
             the horse has no foundation in the fossil record, and that no evolutionary
             process has been observed that would account for the gradual evolution
             of horses:


                                              119
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126