Page 122 - Darwinism Refuted
P. 122

DARWINISM REFUTED


                 The popularly told example of horse evolution, suggesting a gradual
                 sequence of changes from four-toed fox-sized creatures living nearly 50
                 million years ago to today's much larger one-toed horse, has long been
                 known to be wrong. Instead of gradual change, fossils of each intermediate
                 species appear fully distinct, persist unchanged, and then become extinct.
                 Transitional forms are unknown. 152
                 While discussing this important dilemma in the scenario of the
             evolution of the horse in a particularly honest way, Rensberger brought
             the transitional form difficulty onto the agenda as the greatest difficulty of
             all.
                 Dr. Niles Eldredge said the following about the “evolution of the
             horse” diagram:
                 There have been an awful lot of stories, some more imaginative than
                 others, about what the nature of that history [of life] really is. The most
                 famous example, still on exhibit downstairs, is the exhibit on horse evolution
                 prepared perhaps fifty years ago. That has been presented as the literal truth
                 in textbook after textbook. Now I think that is lamentable, particularly when
                 the people who propose those kinds of stories may themselves be aware of
                 the speculative nature of some of that stuff. 153

                 Then what is the scenario of the evolution of the horse? This scenario
             was formulated by means of the deceitful charts devised by the sequential
             arrangement of fossils of distinct species that lived at vastly different
             periods in India, South Africa, North America, and Europe, solely in
             accordance with the rich power of evolutionists' imaginations. More than
             20 charts of the evolution of the horse, which by the way are totally
             different from each other, have been proposed by various researchers.
             Thus, it is obvious that evolutionists have reached no common agreement
             on these family trees. The only common feature in these arrangements is
             the belief that a dog-sized creature called Eohippus (Hyracotherium), which
             lived in the Eocene period 55 million years ago, was the ancestor of the
             horse. However, the fact is that Eohippus, which became extinct millions of
             years ago, is nearly identical to the hyrax, a small rabbit-like animal which
             still lives in Africa and has nothing whatsoever to do with the horse. 154
                 The inconsistency of the theory of the evolution of the horse becomes
             increasingly apparent as more fossil findings are gathered. Fossils of
             modern horse species (Equus nevadensis and Equus occidentalis) have been


                                              120
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127