Page 136 - Darwinism Refuted

DARWINISM REFUTED

(about 67 species) and the filter-feeding baleen whales (10 species) are
considered as two distinct monophyletic groups... On the other hand,
phylogenetic analysis of DNA... and amino acid... sequences contradict this
long-accepted taxonomic division. One group of toothed whales, the sperm
whales, appear to be more closely related to the morphologically highly
divergent baleen whales than to other odontocetes. 169
In short, marine mammals defy the imaginary evolutionary scenarios
which they are being forced to fit.
Contrary to the claims of evolutionist propaganda on the origin of
marine mammals, we are dealing not with an evolutionary process backed
up by empirical evidence, but by evidence coerced to fit a presupposed
evolutionary family tree, despite the many contradictions between the
two.
What emerges, if the evidence is looked at objectively, is that different
living groups emerged independently of each other in the past. This is
compelling empirical evidence of the fact that all of these creatures were
created.
Mammals are regarded as the life forms on the top rungs of the so-
called evolutionary ladder. That being the case, it is hard to explain why
these animals moved over to a marine environment. Another question is
how these creatures adapted to the marine environment even better than
fish, since animals such as the killer whale and the dolphin, which are
mammals and therefore possess lungs, are even better adapted to the
environment they live in than fish that breathe in water.
It is perfectly obvious that the imaginary evolution of marine
mammals cannot be explained in terms of mutations and natural selection.
One article published in GEO magazine refers to the origin of the blue
whale, a marine mammal, and states the despairing position of Darwinism
on the subject thus:
Like blue whales, the bodily structures and organs of other mammals living
in the sea also resemble those of fish. Their skeletons also bear similarities to
those of fish. In whales, the rear limbs that we can refer to as legs exhibited
a reverse development and did not reach full growth. Yet there is not the
slightest information about these animals' form changes. We have to assume
that the return to the sea took place not through a long-term, slow transition
as claimed by Darwinism, but in momentary leaps. Paleontologists today

134