Page 256 - Darwinism Refuted
P. 256

DARWINISM REFUTED


                 of tendonitis. Wilson et al. suggest that the very short muscle fibres protect
                 both bones and tendons from fatigue damage by damping out
                 vibrations… 309

                 In short, a closer look at the anatomy of the horse revealed that the
             structures that have been considered as nonfunctional by evolutionists
             have very important functions.
                 In other words, scientific progress demonstrated that what was
             considered to be evidence for evolution is in fact evidence for creation.
             Evolutionists should be objective and evaluate scientific findings
             reasonably. The Nature article comments as follows:
                 Wilson et al. have found an important role for a muscle that seemed to be the
                 relic of a structure that had lost its function in the course of evolution. Their
                 work makes us wonder whether other vestiges (such as the human
                 appendix) are as useless as they seem. 310
                 This is not surprising. The more we learn about nature, the more we
             see the evidence for creation. As Michael Behe notes, "the conclusion of
             design comes not from what we do not know, but from what we have
             learned over the past 50 years." 311  And Darwinism turns out to be an
             argument from ignorance.


                 The Recapitulation Misconception
                 What used to be called the "recapitulation theory" has long been
             eliminated from scientific literature, but it is still being presented as a
             scientific reality by some evolutionist publications. The term
             "recapitulation" is a condensation of the dictum "ontogeny recapitulates
             phylogeny," put forward by the evolutionary biologist Ernst Haeckel at
             the end of the nineteenth century.
                 This theory of Haeckel's postulates that living embryos re-experience
             the evolutionary process that their pseudo-ancestors underwent. He
             theorized that during its development in its mother's womb, the human
             embryo first displayed the characteristics of a fish, and then those of a
             reptile, and finally those of a human.
                 It has since been proven that this theory is completely bogus. It is
             now known that the "gills" that supposedly appear in the early stages of
             the human embryo are in fact the initial phases of the middle-ear canal,


                                              254
   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261