Page 238 - The Cambrian Evidence that Darwin Failed to Comprehend
P. 238

The Cambrian Evidence That Darwin Failed to Comprehend

                        perfect in scientific faith.  182
                        Darwinists maintain this mindset and never question their
                   blind beliefs when dealing with a phenomenon such as the
                   Cambrian explosion that loudly contradicts evolution in all respects.
                   The Cambrian fossils are scientific fact. Therefore, any mindset that
                   rejects their implications is dogmatic and totally illogical. This
                   mindset inevitably compels Darwinists to engage in unscientific be-
                   havior.
                        The most telling example of this is certainly Walcott’s covering
                   up of the evidence. Academically, Walcott was a knowledgeable and
                   talented scientist who worked for the United States Geological
                   Survey for 27 years, serving as its director for 12 of them. Later, he
                   became the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution and held this
                   post for 20 years, and rose to the position of president of the US
                   National Academy of Sciences. His career made him one of the most
                   important figures in American scientific history.
                        But despite his knowledge and experience, his blindness in the
                   face of the Burgess Shale fossils was seldom to be equaled. Many
                   Burgess Shale life forms told science of the existence of brand new
                   phyla. It was clear to him that these needed to be considered and
                   added alongside other known phyla. Yet Walcott completely ig-
                   nored the Cambrian explosion, described by paleontologists as “the
                   most remarkable and puzzling event in the history of life.” 183
                        Instead of naming these new phyla, he tried to fit the fossils in-
                   to already existing phyla—a most superficial and contrived ap-
                   proach. The world of paleontology realized how rottenly distorted
                   Walcott’s analyses were thanks to Stephen Jay Gould’s award-win-
                   ning book Wonderful Life (1989), and studies by Morris et al.
                        Gould examined Walcott’s notes and photographs and subject-
                   ed them to fierce criticism in his book. He wrote that Walcott had ig-
                   nored the extraordinary nature of the Burgess Shale fossils because





                                                   236
   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243