Page 239 - The Cambrian Evidence that Darwin Failed to Comprehend

HARUN YAHYA

of his Darwinist preconceptions. Because of his devotion to
Darwin’s scenario, Walcott had described a story of his own inven-
tion, rather than the facts before him.
In fact, Walcott was only the first of scientists in denial. In the
face of the Cambrian explosion, present-day evolutionists have also
adopted a far from scientific approach. This dogmatism displayed
by Darwinists did not change even in the face of the zircon dating
that reduced the time span of the Cambrian explosion to a mere 5
million years.
Darwinists have failed to accept such powerful evidence,
something which is an easy requirement of both science and logic.
When it comes to their own world view, they immediately set to one
side any scientific doubts.
Scientific progress is only possible by way of skepticism. If
skepticism is the basis of science, then in the same way that
Darwinists believe that chance can give rise to all things, so should
they also admit the possibility that everything was created by Allah.
Since science requires skepticism, they should allow a 50% possibil-
ity that species did not evolve, but were created. But they insistent-
ly deny that, assuming evolutionary origins for the Cambrian explo-
sion right from the outset, because they reject the possibility of de-
liberate creation. And they insistently ignore the facts obtained
about the Cambrian explosion as the result of a great deal of re-
search and hard work. Although science gives them the answer, they
prefer to ignore it. What a blindly held belief Darwinism is!

Cambrian Life Forms: Marvels of Creation
What you have seen this far regarding the Cambrian clearly re-
veals that new species came into existence suddenly and flawlessly
in their final forms, some 530 million years ago, with no forerunners

Adnan Oktar

237