Page 281 - The Cambrian Evidence that Darwin Failed to Comprehend

Erwin, Frederick J. Collier, The Fossils of 91. Marshall Kay and Edwin H. Colbert,
the Burgess Shale, 1994, Smithsonian Stratigraphy and Life History, 1965, No.
Books, pp. 142-143. 736, pp. 102-103.
72. Ibid., pp. 145-147. 92. Monastersky, “The first monsters:
73. Ibid., p.138. long before sharks, Anomalocaris ruled
74. Ibid., p.150. the seas - oldest known large predators,”
75. Ibid. pp. 201-202. Science News.
76. “The Cambrian,” 93. Ibid.
http://www.palaeos.com/ 94. The complexity in this structure is
Paleozoic/Cambrian/Cambrian.htm enough to refute the evolutionary theory.
77. Briggs, Erwin, Collier, The Fossils of For detailed information please see
the Burgess Shale, p. 199. Darwinism Refuted by Harun Yahya.
78. http://www.sizinti.com.tr/ konu.sizin- 95. Stephen C. Meyer, Paul A. Nelson,
ti?SIN=554355b924&k=293&1331833302 Paul Chien, “The Cambrian Explosion:
79. Briggs, Erwin, Collier, The Fossils of Biology’s Big Bang”, http://www.discov-
the Burgess Shale, p. 131. ery.org/articlefiles/pdfs/cambrian.pdf
80. Ibid., pp. 140-141. 96. Ibid.
81. Fred Heeren, “A little fish challenges 97. Frank B. Salisbury, “Doubts about the
a giant of science,” The Boston Globe, 30 Modern Synthetic Theory of Evolution,”
May 2000, p. E1. American Biology Teacher, September
82.D.-G. Shu et al., “Head and backbone 1971, p. 336.
of the Early Cambrian vertebrate 98. Meyer, Nelson, Chien, “The Cambrian
Haikouichthys,” Nature 421, 526-529, 30 Explosion: Biology’s Big Bang”
January 2003. 99. R. Levi-Setti, Trilobites: A
83. “Primitive Fish May Be Ancestor of Photographic Atlas, University of Chicago
Man,” http://www.china.org.cn/english/cul- Press, Chicago, 1975
ture/54836.htm 100. Richard Fortey, Trilobite, Eyewitness
84. “Oldest fossil fish caught,” BBC News to Evolution, Vintage Books, 2000, pp.
Sci/Tech, November 4, 1999; 27-28.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1 101. Ibid., pp. 30-31.
/hi/sci/tech/504776.stm 102. Ibid.
85. Richard Monastersky, “Waking Up to 103. Ibid. pp. 62-63.
the Dawn of Vertebrates,” Science News, 104. Parker, In the Blink of an Eye, p.
Vol. 156, No. 19, 6 November 1999, p. 188.
292. 105. Fortey, Trilobite, Eyewitness to
86. John Maynard Smith, The Evolution, Evolution, p. 92.
Cambridge University Press, 2000, p. 19. 106. Ibid., pp. 92-94.
87. Gish, Evolution: The Fossils Still Say 107. Ibid., p. 77.
No!, p. 66. 108. Ibid., p. 96.
88. Holmes, “When we were worms,” 109. Ibid., p. 101.
New Scientist. 110. Ibid., p. 98.
89. Masao Ito, Yasushi Miyashita, 111. David Raup, “Conflicts Between
Edmund T. Rolls, Cognition, Computation Darwin and Paleontology”, Bulletin, Field
and Consciousness, Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Vol. 50,
Press, 1997, p. 21. January 1979, p. 24.
90. Michael Denton, Nature’s Destiny, 112. Levi-Setti, Trilobites: A Photographic
Free Press, 1998, p. 321. Atlas, p. 54.

279