Page 282 - The Cambrian Evidence that Darwin Failed to Comprehend

113. Richard Ellis, Aquagenesis, New zon/2000/snowballearth.shtml
York, Viking Publishing, 2001, p. 49. 131. Walker, “Ice magic,” New Scientist,
114. Richard Fortey, “Crystal Eyes,” p. 30.
Natural History, 2000, Vol. 109, No. 8, pp. 132. Parker, In the Blink of an Eye, p. 42.
68-72. 133. Walker, “Ice magic,” New Scientist,
115. Levi-Setti, Trilobites: A Photographic p. 30.
Atlas, p. 54. 134. “Explosion of Life: A scientist reveals
116. Rudolf Prokop, Fossils, Hamlyn details of the Cambrian explosion,”
Colour Guide, Hamlyn, London, 1981. www.origins.org/articles/chien_explo-
117. Ibid., p. 33. sionoflife.html
118. Raup, “Conflicts Between Darwin 135. Stephen C. Meyer, “The origin of bi-
and Paleontology,” Bulletin, pp. 22, 24. ological information and the higher taxo-
119. R. L. Gregory, Eye and Brain: The nomic categories,” Proceedings of the
Physiology of Seeing, Oxford University Biological Society of Washington, May
Press, 1995, p. 31. 18, 2007
120. Sunderland, Darwin’s Enigma, p. 136. Ibid..
168. 137. Ibid.
121. Niles Eldredge and Stephen Jay 138. Ibid.
Gould, “Punctuated Equilibria: An 139. Richard Fortey, “Cambrian Explosion
Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism,” in Exploded?,” Science, 20 July 2001
Models in Paleobiology, ed. T. J. Schopf, 140. Susumo Ohno, “The notion of the
San Francisco, Freeman, Cooper, and Cambrian pananimalia genome,”
Company, 1972, pp. 82–115. Proceedings of the National Academy of
122. Stephen J. Gould, The Structure of Sciences, USA 93 (August 1996): pp.
Evolutionary Theory, Belknap Press, 8475-78.
2002, p. 754. 141. Peter G. Williamson, “Morphological
123. Fortey, Trilobite: Eyewitness to stasis and developmental constraint: real
Evolution, p. 128. problems for neo-Darwinism,” Nature,
124. “Trilobite Origins,” http://www.peripa- Vol. 294, 19 November 1981, p. 214.
tus.gen.nz/Taxa/Arthropoda/Trilobita/TriOr 142. Battson, “On the Origin of Stasis.”
i.html 143. Sunderland, Darwin’s Enigma, p.
125. Sunderland, Darwin’s Enigma, p. 114.
150. 144. http://www.biltek.tubitak.gov.tr/mer-
126. Trends in Genetics, February 1999, ak_ettikleriniz/index.php?kategori_id=7&s
Vol. 15, No. 2. oru_id=1088
127. Bohlin, “Evolution's Big Bang” 145. Holmes, “When we were worms,”
128. Steven Darksyde, The Cambrian New Scientist.
Explosion and Creationism, http://poli- 146. Mini Review: C. Schwabe, 1994.
tics.humanbeams.com/p405darksyde- “Theoretical limitations of molecular phy-
cambrianexplosion.php logenetics and the evolution of relaxins,”
129. Walker, “Ice magic,” New Scientist, Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 107B:167–177;
p. 30. Don Batten, “Hox (homeobox) Genes—
130. BBC Science and Nature, Horizon: Evolution’s Saviour?”, http://www.an-
“Snowball Earth,” swersingenesis.org/docs/4205.asp
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/hori- 147. Holmes, “When we were worms,”

280