Page 166 - The Evolution Impasse 1
P. 166

164



               es known as Homo antecessor, to which  However, it was gradually realized that
               they ascribed the Atapuerca skull.  these two remains were not reliable. (Se-
                                                   e Java Man, Peking Man.) For that rea-
                                                   son, more and more importance began to
               Homo erectus                        be attached to the H. erectus fossils dis-

                  Evolutionists regard the classificati-  covered in Africa. (Also, some evolutio-
               on Homo erectus, meaning “upright-  nists included some of the fossils descri-
               walking human,” as the most primitive  bed as H. erectus in a second class, Ho-
               species on the fictitious human family  mo ergaster. by. The matter is still a sub-
               tree. They have had to separate these hu-  ject of debate.)
               mans from other, earlier classes by me-  The best-known of the H. erectus
               ans of the title upright, because all the H.  specimens discovered in Africa is Nari-
               erectus fossils we have are erect in a  okotome homo erectus or the so-called
               manner not seen in specimens of Austra-  Turkana Boy. The fossil’s upright skele-
               lopithecus or Homo habilis. There is no  ton is identical to that of modern man.
               difference between H. erectus skeletons  201 Therefore, H. erectus is a human ra-
               and those of modern human beings.   ce that is still in existence today. (See
                  Evolutionists’ most important gro-  Turkana Boy, the.)
               unds for regarding H. erectus as “primi-  Professor William Laughlin of the
               tive” are the fact that its brain volume  University of Connecticut carried out
               (900 to 1100 cubic centimeters) is smal-  lengthy anatomical research into Inuit
               ler than the modern human average, and  and the inhabitants of the Aleut Islands
               also its thick protruding eyebrow ridges.  and noted that these people bore an asto-
               The fact is, however, that a great many  nishingly close resemblance to H. erec-
               human beings today have a brain size  tus. Laughlin’s conclusion was that all
               identical to that of H. erectus (pygmies,  these races are actually different races all
               for example), and eyebrow protrusions  belonging to H. sapiens, ¸or today’s man:
               can also be seen in various contempo-  When we consider the vast differences
               rary human races, such as native Austra-  that exist between remote groups such as
               lians. It is a known that there is no corre-  Eskimos and Bushmen, who are known to
               lation between brain size and intelligen-  belong to the single species of Homo sa-
               ce and ability. Intelligence varies not ac-  piens, it seems justifiable to conclude
               cording to brain size, but according to its  that Sinanthropus [an erectus specimen]
               internal organization. 200            belongs within this same diverse species
                                                     [H. sapiens]. 202
                  The fossils that introduced H. erectus
               to the world were Peking Man and Java  There is an enormous gulf between
               Man fossils, both discovered in Asia.  Homo erectus, a human race, and the


                                                      THE EVOLUTION IMPASSE I
   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171