Page 167 - The Evolution Impasse 1
P. 167
165
apes that precede it (Aus- That is why they insist on gi-
tralopithecus, Homo ha- ving H. erectus an ape-li-
bilis, H. rudolfensis) in ke appearance in the re-
the scenario of human constructions they pro-
evolution. In other duce. (For detailed in-
words, the first hu- formation, see The
mans to appear in the Evolution Deceit by
fossil records emerged Harun Yahya.)
suddenly, all at the sa-
me time, and in the absen-
Homo ergaster
ce of any process of evoluti-
on. There could be no clearer Some of the fossils des-
indication that they were crea- cribed as Homo erectus (“upright-
ted. walking human”) are classified as Homo
However, acceptance of this fact wo- ergaster by certain evolutionists. There is
uld constitute a violation of evolutio- no agreement among evolutionists regar-
nists’ dogmatic philosophies and ideolo- ding this second classification. (See Ho-
gies. Therefore, they seek to depict H. mo erectus.)
erectus, a human race, as a semi-ape.
f
e
s
h
l
y
t
h
o
e
s
t
n
f
e
o
A Analyses of the teeth of the e
h
t
t
e
a
u
s
d
u
p
e
o
h
t
i
c
r
t
l
n
a
c
p
s
s
a
e
A
s species Australopithecus and
i
e
a
t
a
o
)
w
e
H Homo habilis (at side) shows that t
d
i
m
o
s
h
l
i
s
b
s
a
i
h
o
(
t
h
s
c
a
s
e
m
b
g
l
e
e
e
e
h
t these belong to the same category y
o
s
r
t
o
e
h
t
n
t
o
a
g
f
r
i
A
a as African apes. .
s
c
p
e
s
a
a
n