Page 179 - What Darwinists Fail To Consider

Adnan Oktar

lution is scientific. Yet Darwinism has been unable to produce the
slightest shred of scientific evidence to support any of its claims.
Darwinism has not been able to explain how a single cell has arisen.
The mechanisms by which thousands of different life forms allegedly
evolved from a single cell have not been demonstrated scientifically.
Not a single example has ever been offered to support the fictitious
claim that one species can turn into another. There are no findings to
prove the longstanding evolutionary myths of fish turning into am-

phibians or reptiles into birds. Not one single transitional-form fossil
has turned up in any of the excavations carried out over the last 150
years. Moreover, the theory of evolution is silent in the face of new dis-
coveries made by the science of genetics.
In short, there is nothing scientific about the theory of evolution.
Science totally refutes the theory of evolution. Astronomy, biology, pa-
leontology, geology, physics, chemistry, geophysics, embryology and
the like are all sciences. Darwinism is not; it is a primitive belief system.
Darwinists use borrowed scientific facts to support their propaganda.
The ways they misuse science are all too familiar:
1. First of all, they propagate the idea that the public cannot un-
derstand scientific matters, that only a handful of elite scientists can do
so,
2. In their writings and lectures, they use scientific terms that most
people are unfamiliar with in order to strengthen that indoctrination,

3. They use lengthy, complicated formulae, Latin terms and ex-
pressions, and an opaque and turgid style to give the impression that
they are discussing something very complex. Even though what they
are saying is complete violation of logic, still they make many people
believe it is wholly scientific,
4. By frequently quoting from Darwinist scientists, academics and
evolutionist publications, they seek to give the impression that the
whole scientific community accepts evolution. They hope thereby to
cover up the fact that evolution actually conflicts with science. Their

177